Dave Chappelle has released a new Netflix special, The Dreamer, which is full of jokes about the trans community and disabled people.

“I love punching down!” he tells the audience, in a one-hour show that landed on the streaming service today (31 December).

It’s his seventh special for Netflix and comes two years after his last one, the highly controversial release The Closer.

That programme was criticised for its relentless jokes about the trans community, and Chappelle revisits the topic in his new show.

He tells jokes about trans women in prison, and about trans people “pretending” to be somebody they are not.

  • @logicbomb
    link
    265 months ago

    “Punching down” also indicates that he thinks he’s somehow on a different level from them. So, it should mean, for example, that he’s making fun of comedians who are less successful than him. Or maybe it means he’s making fun of people who have less money than him.

    But, there’s likely a trans person out there who has more money than him, so what does he actually mean? He’s the one quoted in this special as saying “I love punching down!” Those are his words that he chose. Is he saying that he’s inherently better than a trans person or a disabled person?

    It used to be popular for white people to think they were inherently better than black people. Talk about a lack of perspective.

    • @gedaliyahM
      link
      805 months ago

      Harshly criticizing a powerful group or system (punching up) is considered fair social critique. Harshly criticizing a group or system that is already vulnerable (punching down) is just bullying. It’s not about feeling superior in this context, it’s just about someone with a huge platform using it to put down people who already have a harder life than they need to.

    • @MeaanBeaan
      link
      345 months ago

      Pretty sure the whole punching down thing comes from a story he told in one of these netflix specials where a trans woman in a bar told him she likes his comedy but that he needs to stop punching down against her people. He got all indignant about it and tried explaining that it’s not punching down because he’s black. His logic being that black people are so far down the totem pole it’s impossible for any one of them to “punch down” against a different marginalized group.

      Him using the phrase now comes across more to me as him reveling in the position that he’s, in his mind, been mischaracterized into by the trans community. And less so him actually believing he’s better than anyone.

      Still not at all a good look. And he’s definitely an asshole. The fact that he’s still fixated on this one perceived slight that happened to him several years ago should tell you all you need to know about him. My dude has produced multiple Netflix comedy specials focused on getting back at a community he feels wronged by because a woman said something to him once in a bar that he didn’t like.

    • Sneezycat
      link
      fedilink
      95 months ago

      I interpret it as just being a less oppressed class laughing at a more oppressed class. But it does raise a good point.

    • @jimbo
      link
      -22
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      deleted by creator

    • @Jayb151
      link
      -575 months ago

      “talk about lack of perspective”

      Just a heads up, punching down is a term used in the comedy world. It’s more like, telling a dumb joke that’s easy. It’s an easy win that most people will laugh at, rather than creating humor using actual skill.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        505 months ago

        Just a heads up, ‘punching down’ means ‘To attack or criticize someone in a less powerful position’. That’s the definition. It’s not limited to the comedy world.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          15 months ago

          No it’s not limited to it, but Chappelle is deeply part of the comedy world. That’s where he would be using the term from.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            65 months ago

            and yet in comedy it still refers to attacking people in a less powerful position. It has nothing to do with jokes being easy or dumb.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              35 months ago

              I misread somehow, you’re absolutely right.

              Maybe the other person is thinking of low hanging fruit.

    • @RupeThereItIs
      link
      English
      -725 months ago

      OR, ya’ll are missing the joke entirely, in that he doesn’t think he’s ‘punching down’… nore is he making fun of who you think he is.

      In fact, the joke is at the expense of people like those in this thread who are getting bent out of shape taking words out of context. It was tailor made to upset YOU, specifically. YOU, and your unnecessary outrage, are the butt of the joke. He’s mocking those who go overboard with the virtue signaling, and you all here are taking the bait hook, line & sinker.

      There is a problem right now with self elected ‘thought police’ trying to remove all discourse, and that is VERY unhealthy for a liberal society. Totalitarianism is not healthy, no matter what your motivation is. Sacred cows are ALWAYS something to be targeted by comedy & satire, and the left wing totalitarianist word/thought police are very much a valid target, every bit as much as the MAGA idiots. For society as a whole, they are equally as dangerous, the end goal is the same but with different underlying motivations.

      That being said, the special was lackluster. It felt like he was contractually obligated to give Netflix another special by the end of 2023 but didn’t have enough material yet & even what he had wasn’t very polished.

      • Riskable
        link
        fedilink
        English
        575 months ago

        You’ve set off my 1984 alarm: Never use the term, “thought police” in reference to private individuals making decisions about others actions. If you actually read 1984 (it’s a short book and easy to find online, go read it) the Thought Police were part of the government. As in, policing people’s thoughts was a function of the government (in order to maintain the status quo, avoiding change aka extreme conservativism).

        Here, you’re referring to a collection of people that have decided–on their own–to boycott a comedian because they don’t like where he stands on certain topics. That’s not Thought Police! Call them snowflakes or “too sensitive” or “hysterical” or some other bullshit (don’t care, really) but please for the love of Orwell stop using that term to refer to non-governmental entities or the actions of people that aren’t part of any authority.

        When the government starts cracking down on people’s speech then by all means refer to this action as, “Thought Police”.

        • @vxx
          link
          85 months ago

          Don’t believe they aren’t aware that they’re hypocritical.

          I have heard the 1982 argument numerous times from people that support banning books.

          These strategies have been used for ages

          Never believe that anti-Semites are completely unaware of the absurdity of their replies. They know that their remarks are frivolous, open to challenge. But they are amusing themselves, for it is their adversary who is obliged to use words responsibly, since he believes in words. The anti-Semites have the right to play. They even like to play with discourse for, by giving ridiculous reasons, they discredit the seriousness of their interlocutors. They delight in acting in bad faith, since they seek not to persuade by sound argument but to intimidate and disconcert. If you press them too closely, they will abruptly fall silent, loftily indicating by some phrase that the time for argument is past.

          ~Jean-Paul Sartre

      • @Drivebyhaiku
        link
        35
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        This represents a common issue in the discourse. Conservatives tend to use a group of people to try and score points against leftists, liberals people NOT a part of the minority while using the minority as nothing more than a weapon. It doesn’t matter how much we get banged up. In this case it’s cis people using the existence and expressed needs of trans people to try and discredit other cis people while misrepresenting the needs and causes of trans people. We are not bullets to be fired at our own defenders.

        You think no trans people are made to feel alienated by this? That in the shockwave following another bombing run we don’t get to hear variations of this rhetoric in our workplaces and get to feel like we need to chose between our mental health and the precarity of keeping food on the table? That people won’t feel empowered to come at us with new fodder to make us to routinely have to defend ourselves against whatever transphobic nonsense is getting panned as a “dig against the libs”? We fight for rights to actually live in our bodies with a mental load out that is hard for cis people to comprehend at a basic level and that gets represented as high humor by someone who very obviously hasn’t got a clue during a time when we are under political fire and human rights campaigns have labelled the USA actively hostile to trans people. It’s beyond poor taste, it’s preaching to the ignorance and intolerance of people directly.

          • BrooklynMan
            link
            English
            215 months ago

            it’s totalitarianism vs freedom to have intelligent discourse

            bigotry isn’t “intelligent discourse”, and calling out bigots for their bigotry isn’t “totalitarianism."

          • Flying Squid
            link
            65 months ago

            I will ask again- Is Dave Chapelle entitled to a Netflix Special?

            • @Sarmyth
              link
              05 months ago

              Netflix is entitled to a Dave Chapelle special. Contracts were signed. We could be getting a Kanye moment, though.

              • Flying Squid
                link
                25 months ago

                That’s a separate issue. That’s a contractual issue. We’re talking in terms of speech here. Because this whole ‘thought police’ thing sure makes it sound like his rights are somehow being violated if he doesn’t have a Netflix special.

        • @jimbo
          link
          -20
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          deleted by creator

          • @Drivebyhaiku
            link
            115 months ago

            There is definitely trans friendly humour that can see us be the willing butt of the joke… But representing us as “just pretending” or appealing to the squeamishness of cis people about our potential medical choices or making open commentary on our genetalia or coping strategies isn’t exactly humour we can laugh along with when we face that shit from people regularly and have to either pretend it doesn’t bother us or ask people to drop it just to move on with our day.

            For you it’s a novelty, for us it’s fucking routine annoyance. People want to confront us to have these conversations about how we’re weird or wrong or liars with us over and over again and repeat like mindless parrots idiotic shit people believe about us that is patently false and then have the gall to wonder why we dislike them for it.

            Chappelle wants to make believe he’s saying the taboo things that people are forcibly restrained from saying to our faces… But we hear this shit from family members and friends we have to let go of and coworkers and random idiots who corner us in public. But when we ask people to please for the love of god just STOP they get offended and wheel out the “you can’t tell me what to do!” and the "you’re so fragile! "

            We aren’t fragile, we’re just tired of your stale bullshit.

      • queermunist she/her
        link
        fedilink
        16
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        When I tell someone to shut the fuck up I’m merely expressing my own right to free speech, I’m not taking away someone else’s right to speak! How is that “thought police”? They are still free to ignore me, they just have to deal with the fact that I disprove.

        And that’s what babies like this are really mad about. Baby can’t stand the thought that people don’t like him!

        I’m also free to not watch his special, not give him money, and tell other people to do the same. And baby doesn’t like that!

      • Flying Squid
        link
        135 months ago

        There is a problem right now with self elected ‘thought police’ trying to remove all discourse, and that is VERY unhealthy for a liberal society.

        Is Dave Chapelle entitled to a Netflix special? Does he have a right to a Netflix special? Is not letting him have a Netflix special taking away his basic free speech rights?

        If so, I want my Netflix special too.

      • @sartalon
        link
        -525 months ago

        Man, don’t waste your time and energy.

        Most of these commenters just want to be angry.

        I agree with your comment 100%.

          • @sartalon
            link
            -315 months ago

            Wow, it usually takes some knowledge about a subject to come to a conclusion like that.

            But you came to that conclusion without any knowledge at all.

            Just like most of these comments about Dave Chappelle’s latest standup.

            Pretty on brand of you to form an ignorant and severely judgemental conclusion based on little to no information at all.

            You sound like an American Republican.

            • deejay4am
              link
              English
              165 months ago

              And here you are baiting, strawman after strawman

              • @jimbo
                link
                -8
                edit-2
                4 months ago

                deleted by creator

                  • @SCB
                    link
                    -45 months ago

                    Have you watched the show or are you arguing here about what you’ve decided the show is about?

                    Because if it’s the latter then yes, it’s a straw man. It’s basically a textbook straw man.

              • @sartalon
                link
                -255 months ago

                I’ll take comments that show the individual has no idea what they are talking about, for $500, Alex.

              • @sartalon
                link
                -265 months ago

                You can’t even make a real argument, and just use sarcasm and personal attacks.

                Be angry at me all you want.

                But next time you see such an obviously baiting headline, like this “article”… ask yourself if it’s a real article or just clickbait that wants to trick you into scrolling through 40 ads to read something that doesn’t expand on the headline AT ALL.

                And then wonder if there is a lot of “news” floating out there meant to make you angry just so you drive traffic to the source.

                If you question this kind of nonsense even once, moving forward, then these last 10 minutes was well worth the effort.