Hope this isn’t a repeated submission. Funny how they’re trying to deflect blame after they tried to change the EULA post breach.

  • @jacktherippah
    link
    English
    2
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Why anyone would ever trust somebody else with their DNA data is beyond me.

    • @jimbo
      link
      English
      -9
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      deleted by creator

      • @Snapz
        link
        English
        89 months ago

        This is always the most short-sighted kind of comment on the internet, I don’t assume you’re ignorant, I assume you’re selfish - Do you not see a responsibility to future generations in any of your actions or are you just here to “get yours” and check out?

        While there are real and immediate dangers today, our responsibility in this moment is to be a firm NO so that these things don’t find their extremes in our lifetime or beyond. You’re the frog in the pot of cold water, but the burner is turned on beneath you.

        “What the fuck are you guys talking about man? being all hysterical and shit? The water is comfortable right now, even a bit cold”

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          3
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Anyone can obtain your DNA by picking a single hair of yours or a dirty napkin. Your DNA is an open secret.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            2
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            And there would likely be legal ramifications if they actually used that information in a way that harmed me. That’s not so clear when given up willingly.

          • @Snapz
            link
            English
            09 months ago

            And anyone can hate a group of people, the difference between that hate staying small, isolated and relatively contained is organization and systemization - so for example, IBM catalogues and analyzes data for the nazis and you then get an amplification of strength of that hatred that effectively results in the holocaust (instead of something that would have maybe been more like Putin’s limp, flailing invasion of Ukraine).

            Yes I can pull a single hair from your head, but if I create a machine where you and 50 million of your friends send me that hair, pay me for the privilege and I then sell the data or it gets breached, that’s where we start to get into the danger zone.

            Those of you here being contrarians for the sake of it are on the wrong side of history. Learn a book, shitheads.

        • @jimbo
          link
          English
          1
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          deleted by creator

          • @Snapz
            link
            English
            09 months ago

            You’re very confidently ignorant. I’m glad this is only an internet conversation and it can just full stop here - I do feel bad for the people that have to suffer you daily in real life though.

            • @jimbo
              link
              English
              0
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              deleted by creator

        • @jimbo
          link
          English
          -2
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          deleted by creator

          • @linearchaos
            link
            English
            09 months ago

            Ahh you’re in denial because it’s inconvenient to your world view, splendid!

            • @jimbo
              link
              English
              0
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              deleted by creator

              • @linearchaos
                link
                English
                19 months ago

                That way you can tell them that they’re wrong and by some small fraction feel better about your life choices, yeah we get it.

      • @psud
        link
        English
        59 months ago

        The biggest worry is that the data might be right and might be used by an insurance provider to deny a person’s cover

        Though that’s not a realistic problem. The various DNA ancestry companies’ privacy policies prevent them sharing with insurance companies.

        • @jimbo
          link
          English
          1
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          deleted by creator

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        29 months ago

        If I am an insurance company, and I have data that says you are carrying a gene that is correlated with colon cancer, I can either raise the fuck out of your rates because youre a risky client who might cost me a lot of money in colon cancer treatments, or when you do get colon cancer I could refuse to cover it because I have a contract clause you didnt read that says if youre genetically correlated thats functionally a pre-existing condition and thus isnt a part of your coverage.

        If I am a med company, and I know what your genes correlate with known treatable genetic diseases that become fatal or more serious to people like you with those genes, I can raise the price of your medication. You have to pay, because you will die if you dont, so I can ask for any price.

        If I am a texas politician, who is already threatening hospitals across the nation illegally for your private medical data, I am salivating trying to get your dna. Correlate any gene, or suite of genes, with a population of people you do not like, and you can target them through this. “Prove” a genetic superiority to defend and promote eugenic ideals, while targeting your racial scapegoat at a genetic level. Look like one race? Well your blood says youre not pure, so youre next too.

        These are only the obvious problems.

        • @jimbo
          link
          English
          2
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          deleted by creator

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            19 months ago

            The insurance company doesnt want or need to give you discounts. They are buying this data from companies like 23andme, after the professionals have indexed and prorated it. Telling the customer risks scandal, and buying from youmeans they need to process it in house. This back door pre analyzed data sharing keeps you in the dark, and your money in their pocket.

            Med companies do not use this to develop the medication, they use it to change the price of existing meds based on your need. Diseases and disorders are not equally lethal. They are buying this data to get the information on how badly you need the drug, and alter the price accordingly.

            They arent going to let anything stand in the way of their plans, they are already illegally collecting this information. More data makes this easier for them.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Sell to insurance companies. Genetic predisposition towards certain illnesses? That’s a premium.

        And the insidious thing is, it’s not even just you. Any relative that does a test, boom, they know.

        • @jimbo
          link
          English
          1
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          deleted by creator

      • @ScaNtuRd
        link
        English
        29 months ago

        Explain what someone’s realistically going to do with your DNA data.

        You are obviously oblivious to how mass-surveillance works, and how much it can destroy our freedoms. Services like 23AndMe keep a database over all the DNA they have received. This database is often shared with governments, and can be used to create relationship maps - who is what to whom. This information can be and is being weaponized against us on a daily basis.

        • @RazorsLedge
          link
          English
          29 months ago

          In what ways is it actively being weaponized? Examples, sources?

        • @jimbo
          link
          English
          1
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          deleted by creator

          • @ScaNtuRd
            link
            English
            09 months ago

            The evidence is literally publicly available. It takes mere seconds to find court records and articles online. But it is just easier for you to sit there and scream “what is your evidence?” as some headless chicken, right?

            • @jimbo
              link
              English
              1
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              deleted by creator