In a letter published Wednesday on Medium, an anonymous group of Biden’s campaign staffers demanded the president call for a ceasefire in Gaza, citing concerns that not shifting his policy on the issue could hurt his 2024 chances.


“Biden for President staff have seen volunteers quit in droves, and people who have voted blue for decades feel uncertain about doing so for the first time ever, because of this conflict,” the Medium letter read.

“It is not enough to merely be the alternative to Donald Trump,” the campaigners continued. “The campaign has to shift the feeling in the pits of voters’ stomachs, the same feeling that weighs on us every day as we fight for your reelection. The only way to do that is to call for a ceasefire.”

  • @treeko
    link
    7111 months ago

    This thread is wild… is it seriously shocking to people here that Biden campaigners (plurality young people) are upset about his response to the genocide in Gaza?? Yes, obviously we need to vote for him, but it’s crazy that criticism is labeled as astroturfing or attempts to sabotage his chances.

    • @mlg
      link
      English
      3411 months ago

      I really hate that every time someone criticizes him, some dumbass replies with “Yeah well Trump is way worse”

      Yeah no shit lol, just because I hate the current president doesn’t mean I’m automatically selecting the deranged orange.

      • Semi-Hemi-Demigod
        link
        fedilink
        011 months ago

        That’s why I dislike “approval” polling. I haven’t approved of most of the people I’ve voted for. That’s the point of our system: You vote for people you hate and they do things you don’t like.

        • @Daft_ish
          link
          011 months ago

          Looks at what happens when people vote for someone they like. The bigots coalesce and you get Trump.

          • @hark
            link
            211 months ago

            Yeah, bigots get a candidates that they like and they went to the polls with a big smile on their face. They had a reason to vote. Everyone else? “Here, have this old out-of-touch jackass that we pushed through the primaries by having all the other candidates drop down right before super tuesday, while keeping Warren in to split votes with Bernie, and having all our buddies in big media tell everyone about the supposed miracle comeback from biden”. Covid won 2020 for biden, but he thinks he’s hot shit. The closest thing to hot shit about him is what’s in his diaper.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        15
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Have you never spent your spare time contributing to something you care about? I spend time contributing to open source code and Wikipedia, previously I’ve spent time building stuff to make a local park nicer. I could definitely see myself spending time campaigning for a political party if I felt the future of my country depended on it.

        When you’re doing something like that, spending time on something you have a passion for together with others, it’s typically more fun and fulfilling than tiresome. You should try it some time.

      • @SCB
        link
        611 months ago

        If you want to see any of your political goals come to fruition, volunteering is by far the best way to do that.

        Volunteer for local campaigns often. Participate heavily. Consider becoming a citizen lobbyist.

        I love the work I do for Citizens Climate Lobby, for instance.

        https://citizensclimatelobby.org/

    • @phoneymouse
      link
      511 months ago

      I’m upset too, but there is more than one issue in the world. These people need to put things in perspective. If Trump wins, America is literally over.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        011 months ago

        So, genocide is a “single issue” which means it should be ignored? How can you hope for any semblance of change if you start by overlooking literal genocide

        • @dvoraqs
          link
          4
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          How can you hope for any semblance of change…

          You balance it against your other priorities

        • @assassin_aragorn
          link
          4
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          It isn’t overlooking it to accept that there’s nothing we can do about it. There will be no viable candidate who opposes Israel, and that’s the unfortunate truth. There are still significant differences however between the two candidates, and I don’t want the one who’s likely to start a domestic genocide to win.

          There’s blood on our hands, and we don’t have a way to wipe it off. I’d rather accept it and try to move forward than try in vain to clean them.

        • Semi-Hemi-Demigod
          link
          fedilink
          411 months ago

          How can you hope for any semblance of change

          I don’t. I gave up hope a while ago. Feels nice.

        • @SCB
          link
          -1111 months ago

          It isn’t a literal genocide, but a figurative one, which is the source of the disagreement.

          0.0044% of Gazans have been killed. The US killed the same net amount of civilians during the Battle of Mosul, and Gaza is three times as dense as Mosul.

          This number will go up, because this war is being brutally waged, and Israel does deserve criticism for it. But words matter, and genocide is a dumb word to use because it has actual meanings, and requires specific intent

          • SilverserenOP
            link
            fedilink
            711 months ago

            0.0044% of Gazans have been killed.

            ???

            The population of the Gaza Strip is just over 2 million (2.048). The amount of Gazans killed in the past three months is 22600, as of today. That is, by my math, 1.13% of the population that has been killed in those three months, or 1 out of every 100 people.

            • Prophet
              link
              English
              8
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              To add to this, genocide (as defined by the UN) does not just include directly killing a particular group:

              Definition Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide

              Article II

              In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:

              1. Killing members of the group; 2. Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; 3. Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; 4. Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group; 5. Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

              So in addition to killing 20k+ Gaza civilians, Israel’s response has displaced countless others with their intense and indiscriminate bombing (see points #2, #3, possibly #4). NYT and other sources claim that up to 1.8 million Gazans have been displaced, which NYT claims is 80% of their population. This is in addition to the conditions Gaza was already being subjected to, such as being denied water and electricity (#3) by Israel.

              The evidence overwhelmingly shows that this is genocide. “Figurative” is such a sleazy doublespeak way of excusing the behavior here.

              Edit: sorry my link should work now

            • @SCB
              link
              111 months ago

              Weird because words still have meanings even if this person disagrees.

              • @TokenBoomer
                link
                -211 months ago

                Pretty sure he knows the definition of “genocide” better than you.

                • @SCB
                  link
                  111 months ago

                  Weird because I don’t

                  • @TokenBoomer
                    link
                    -2
                    edit-2
                    11 months ago

                    Lol… how humble of you. Dunning-Kruger epitome y’all.

        • @phoneymouse
          link
          211 months ago

          You don’t have to. You can have your own views and make the best decision available to you given the circumstances.

            • @phoneymouse
              link
              611 months ago

              No I’m saying that you can vote for someone and not agree with everything they stand for because that’s the best option you have. We do need reforms in America, but is that a reason to not vote or to wait around until all the conditions are perfect for you to vote your ideals?

              • knightly the Sneptaur
                link
                fedilink
                1
                edit-2
                11 months ago

                So if I disagree with one pro-genocide politician less than the other, I should support a pro-genocide candidate? That’s not reasonable, it’s falling prey to a false choice. I hate to paraphrase the Declaration of Independence at Americans, but at least the founders understood when the course of human events made it necessary to dissolve political ties.

              • @pozbo
                link
                -5
                edit-2
                11 months ago

                So what is the move? It’s clearly wrong to vote for Biden and you say not voting is a waste. So be frank and say what you’re thinking clearly and plainly.

                • @HipHoboHarold
                  link
                  411 months ago

                  They did say it clearly. But let me see if I can’t help.

                  You can have a slap in the face

                  Or a rusty shank to the neck

                  One or the other.

                  If you don’t pick, one will be picked for you.

                  I get not wanting to vote for him. I do. But not all of us get that luxury.

                  I’m gay. Me and my boyfriend are talking about leaving the country. He’s got one last semester of nursing school. Lots of places are desperate for nurses. We can probably get out. If we do, then I can say we get to move.

                  If the Republicans win, it won’t just be get to, it will become need to as well. Any queer person who stays is taking a big risk. But not everyone will be able to leave.

                  Between the push for a fascist theocracy with Trump as the dictator as he uses phrases pulled from the Nazis and gives us their plans under Project 2025, I don’t get the luxury of saying “Well, let’s see if we can’t come back from this.” When we talk about being terrified of a Republican presidency, we are not exaggerating.

                  This isn’t a light decision to make. I hate it. Even if the dems win, we might still leave. Project 2025 will just turn to Project 2029. Project 2033. Eventually they will win. But in the mean time I have to decide between voting for Joe who supports Isreal

                  Or risk Trump who supports Isreal, but also supports the same thing here

                  It’s Biden or Trump

                  A slap in the face or a rusty shank to the neck

                  • HACKthePRISONS
                    link
                    fedilink
                    -511 months ago

                    Palestinians aren’t getting slapped in the face. it’s a fucking genocide

                  • HACKthePRISONS
                    link
                    fedilink
                    -611 months ago

                    if the choice is leaving or voting for genocide, I’d pack my bags. I can’t believe you’re about to vote to send more money to Israel to kill Palestinians.