• @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              11 year ago

              Not really. The whole thing started because people were buying it from farm supply stores where it was being sold for animal usage

        • Tar_Alcaran
          link
          fedilink
          21 year ago

          1- they’re not buying the human pills, because those require a prescription and don’t actually work against Covid.

          2- the tubes of medication they ARE buying are from veterinary stores, and the main purpose is indeed to deworm horses. There’s a horse on the package and everything.

          3- the name stuck, because the people taking ivermectin to stop Covid were/are a bunch of antivax morons deserving of much more than merely scorn and ridicule for the number of deaths on their hands.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 year ago

              It’s not misleading in either accuracy or implication. It is not inaccurate to say it is horse dewormer, it is also not misleading to imply it is as effective as using horse dewormer.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                11 year ago

                It implies that’s it’s main use, which it’s isn’t. We give gorillas birth control but you don’t see people calling the birth control women take “gorilla birth control” that’s just silly

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  1
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  A distinction without difference. So what if it has other uses? None of them are more effective against COVID as it’s use as horse dewormer. Again, it isn’t misleading in fact or implication.

                  The people using the horse dewormer are silly, calling it horse dewormer brings light to that fact.

                  I think the problem with your analogy is that it isn’t analogous. The flaw is that the drug is used as a contraceptive in both species, so it has similarity in use, you’d be silly calling it gorilla contraceptive because it is effective as a contraceptive. If people started taking gorilla contraceptive to cure cystic fibrosis (actually analogous) call it gorrilla contraceptive to mock them all you want.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    11 year ago

                    It’s a human dewormer is what I’m getting at. It cures many diseases caused by parasites, in humans. It absolutely is analogous because humans use it for parasites and diseases caused by parasites. It won the nobel prize for human use, not horse use.