• krimsonbun
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1411 months ago

      In my opinion the windows way of doing it is very unsafe, especially for regular users (who mostly use windows) that don’t exactly know who’s trustworthy, and especially on such a mainstream OS that is much more vulnerable to malware.

      Linux has it very well figured out with repositories, especially universal ones like flatpak. They’re much more secure and trustworthy. It has the benefits of a walled garden and the benefits of an open ecosystem.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        311 months ago

        Windows does have the Microsoft Store, although there are some notable omissions, including Chrome.

        • cheesepotatoes
          link
          511 months ago

          The windows store never really took off unfortunately. It’s mostly filled with random jank in my experience.

        • krimsonbun
          link
          fedilink
          English
          111 months ago

          Exactly my point, actually. It’s not that it’s harder to make malware for Linux, but as a desktop OS, there’s just a really small demand for it at this point in time. I don’t doubt that when and if Linux gets more mainstream (again, for the desktop) more malware will be produced for it, we’re actually already seeing an increase in malware.

          But we’re also seeing a big change in package distribution for Desktop Linux, mainly with flatpak and more specifically flathub. We’re kind of leaving behind our baby stage and becoming more professional and secure when it comes to how software is distributed for our users.

          I’m excited to see how our community grows and develops and how we handle challenges that only bigger operating systems have had to deal with.

    • bitwolf
      link
      fedilink
      511 months ago

      The store is the same packages your distro uses. Unless you’re building Linux from scratch?