‘Impossible’ to create AI tools like ChatGPT without copyrighted material, OpenAI says::Pressure grows on artificial intelligence firms over the content used to train their products

  • @afraid_of_zombies
    link
    English
    -11 year ago

    Neither is a corporation and yet they claim first amendment rights.

    • @BURN
      link
      English
      21 year ago

      That’s an entirely separate problem, but is certainly a problem

      • @afraid_of_zombies
        link
        English
        -11 year ago

        I don’t think it is. We have all these non-human stuff we are awarding more rights to than we have. You can’t put a corporation in jail but you can put me in jail. I don’t have freedom from religion but a corporation does.

        • @BURN
          link
          English
          21 year ago

          Corporations are not people, and should not be treated as such.

          If a company does something illegal, the penalty should be spread to the board. It’d make them think twice about breaking the law.

          We should not be awarding human rights to non-human, non-sentient creations. LLMs and any kind of Generative AI are not human and should not in any case be treated as such.

          • @afraid_of_zombies
            link
            English
            -11 year ago

            Corporations are not people, and should not be treated as such.

            Understand. Please tell Disney that they no longer own Mickey Mouse.

            • @BURN
              link
              English
              11 year ago

              Again, I literally already said that it’s a problem.

              IP law is also different than granting rights to corporations. Corporations SHOULD be allowed to own IP, provided they’ve compensated the creator.

                • @BURN
                  link
                  English
                  11 year ago

                  Honestly, yes. I’m ok with that. People are not entitled to be able to do anything they want with someone else’s IP. 90 years is almost reasonable. Cut it in half and I’d also consider it fairly reasonable.

                  I’m all for expanding copyright for individuals and small companies (small media companies, photographers who are incorporated, artists who make money based on commissions, etc) and reducing it for mega corps, but there’s an extremely fine line around that.

                  • @afraid_of_zombies
                    link
                    English
                    -21 year ago

                    Well I am not. If the goal is to promote artistic creation it should not follow inheritance. Heck it shouldn’t even be 45 years. No one at Disney was alive when Mickey was made therefore it should be public domain.

                    Once you fix that let me know.