I’m politically agnostic and have moved from a slightly conservative stance to a vastly more progressive stance (european). i still dont get the more niche things like tankies and anarchists at this point but I would like to, without spending 10 hours reading endless manifests (which do have merit, no doubt, but still).

Can someone explain to me why anarchy isnt the guy (or gal, or gang, or entity) with the bigger stick making the rules?

  • @weeeeum
    link
    English
    510 months ago

    It basically is that. People WANT organization and rules, that’s how humans evolved. By working together you become much more efficient. This is why countries form and why nearly any inhabited land has A government. Of course there is always one willing to be leader.

    Even with the countries themselves, globalisation has prevented rogue states from doing whatever they want and a clear world order has formed.

    Other than civil wars there are no real representations of anarchy, let alone “peaceful” or “utopian”.