@[email protected] to British [email protected] • 10 months ago3 Vancouver police officers acquitted of assault in 2017 arrestwww.cbc.camessage-square6fedilinkarrow-up112arrow-down10
arrow-up112arrow-down1external-link3 Vancouver police officers acquitted of assault in 2017 arrestwww.cbc.ca@[email protected] to British [email protected] • 10 months agomessage-square6fedilink
minus-squareRolling Resistancelink6•10 months agoThe man was already on the ground and barely moving when police came and broke his ribs, and somehow this was reasonable and legal?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink6•10 months agoThe judge discounted the medical doctors review of the kneeing , and opinion that it causes chest injuries. The judge seems highly biased
minus-squareTSG_Asmodeus (he, him)linkEnglish4•10 months agoWait, hold on, a judge who is biased towards cops? Well I never.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish2•10 months agoIs the judge qualified to do an analysis of the video and what kinds of injury a force to part of a body can do. Not saying that he’s right or wrong, but wouldn’t a forensic analyst be the one to make that conclusion?
The man was already on the ground and barely moving when police came and broke his ribs, and somehow this was reasonable and legal?
The judge discounted the medical doctors review of the kneeing , and opinion that it causes chest injuries. The judge seems highly biased
Wait, hold on, a judge who is biased towards cops? Well I never.
Is the judge qualified to do an analysis of the video and what kinds of injury a force to part of a body can do.
Not saying that he’s right or wrong, but wouldn’t a forensic analyst be the one to make that conclusion?
Exactly my thought