@[email protected] to Programmer [email protected] • edit-21 year agoFitbit Clock Faceprogramming.devimagemessage-square123fedilinkarrow-up11.35Karrow-down124
arrow-up11.32Karrow-down1imageFitbit Clock Faceprogramming.dev@[email protected] to Programmer [email protected] • edit-21 year agomessage-square123fedilink
minus-square@Psythiklink16•1 year agoWatches should be round IMO. I’m happy with my Samsung Watch 4 Classic.
minus-square@Aceticonlink32•1 year agoYeah, but square screens are way cheaper to procure and to program for, and every little helps in an open source project aiming for $30.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink13•1 year agohonestly just depends on what kind of watchface you want, square is cheaper and in some ways more convenient so if you don’t want an analog clockface there’s no reason to bother
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink-5•1 year agoit’s ugly and sticks out too much when it’s square. round is classy
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink5•1 year agoTrue but it can also look sleek/modern, or at least rectangular can imo.
Watches should be round IMO. I’m happy with my Samsung Watch 4 Classic.
Yeah, but square screens are way cheaper to procure and to program for, and every little helps in an open source project aiming for $30.
honestly just depends on what kind of watchface you want, square is cheaper and in some ways more convenient so if you don’t want an analog clockface there’s no reason to bother
it’s ugly and sticks out too much when it’s square. round is classy
True but it can also look sleek/modern, or at least rectangular can imo.