@[email protected] to Programmer [email protected] • edit-211 months agoFitbit Clock Faceprogramming.devimagemessage-square123fedilinkarrow-up11.34Karrow-down124
arrow-up11.32Karrow-down1imageFitbit Clock Faceprogramming.dev@[email protected] to Programmer [email protected] • edit-211 months agomessage-square123fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink13•11 months agohonestly just depends on what kind of watchface you want, square is cheaper and in some ways more convenient so if you don’t want an analog clockface there’s no reason to bother
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink-5•11 months agoit’s ugly and sticks out too much when it’s square. round is classy
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink5•11 months agoTrue but it can also look sleek/modern, or at least rectangular can imo.
honestly just depends on what kind of watchface you want, square is cheaper and in some ways more convenient so if you don’t want an analog clockface there’s no reason to bother
it’s ugly and sticks out too much when it’s square. round is classy
True but it can also look sleek/modern, or at least rectangular can imo.