Ambassadors to Washington warn that the GOP-Democratic divide is endangering America’s national security.

When I asked the European ambassador to talk to me about America’s deepening partisan divide, I expected a polite brushoff at best. Foreign diplomats are usually loath to discuss domestic U.S. politics.

Instead, the ambassador unloaded for an hour, warning that America’s poisonous politics are hurting its security, its economy, its friends and its standing as a pillar of democracy and global stability.

The U.S. is a “fat buffalo trying to take a nap” as hungry wolves approach, the envoy mused. “I can hear those Champagne bottle corks popping in Moscow — like it’s Christmas every fucking day.”

As voters cast ballots in the Iowa caucuses Monday, many in the United States see this year’s presidential election as a test of American democracy. But, in a series of conversations with a dozen current and former diplomats, I sensed that to many of our friends abroad, the U.S. is already failing that test.

  • NoneOfUrBusiness
    link
    fedilink
    6
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Imagine the USA decides it’s time to leverage military might for economic gain.

    I see what you mean in general, but it’s a bit funny to assume the US hasn’t been leveraging its military for economic gain (see: the whole Mmiddle East).

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      1211 months ago

      A less controversial example is that the USA provides security for many shipping lanes. Few countries are in a position to do that currently.

    • @agitatedpotato
      link
      7
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Fair enough, but as it stands the US is tolerable as a security guarantor because they use that force “fairly” enough to other powerful states. Without other states invested in the US econ theres much less to lose and instead of protecting them, the US could easily use their existing global reach to extort anyone who needs that security, pay up or you’re on your own. And that money would go right to the presumably despotic government, not even routed through multinationals that buy the government representatives. Neither is preferable, but if the government becomes nothing but a military, more money directly to them would likely cause more bad things.