This looks toxic, by the way.

  • @blahsay
    link
    104 months ago

    Ever hear about medal of honour winners killing 12 people with 5 bullets in them? Bullets aren’t always show stoppers

    Add some meth or fentanyl to the mix and it’s sadly pretty much zombie rules to put them down.

    • FuglyDuck
      link
      English
      74 months ago

      this is why cops dump entire mags without thinking.

      that and most of them can’t actually shoot for shit.

      • @blahsay
        link
        44 months ago

        You say that but most cops still will go their whole career without firing their gun statistically.

        Plus hand guns are crazy hard to aim over any distance

        • FuglyDuck
          link
          English
          22
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          You say that but most cops still will go their whole career without firing their gun statistically.

          you know the other part of that statistic, right? that those who do tend to get into substantially more situations that ‘require’ lethal force in the first place. Some of this has to do with where they happen to work… cops working in departments within large cities are much more likely than cops out in the burbs or sticks. Part of it is also their specific occupational specialty- SWAT for example is just put into more situations where it’s necessary, compared to state highway patrol vehicle inspectors. or the Federal Reserve Cops.

          Plus hand guns are crazy hard to aim over any distance

          Yeah, that’s true enough when your average cop has less than 15 hours of range time annually, and only quals out once a year. The vast majority of distance for police engagement is 3-6 feet. I can put a four inch grouping at fifty feet, a six inch grouping at thirty feet in stress simulations. And I am not some badass. I just get a lot of range time for work.

          If you’re going to carry… you need to be able to hit what you’re aiming at. a miss isn’t just a miss. Its a chance to clip that kid playing ball a hundred yards a way, or the grandma poking her head out the curtains to see what the fuck is going on outside.

          Cops need to be better- every round that misses it’s target is potentially some random kid caught in the crossfire. Personally, cops need way more training on not going to lethal force in the first place. but that’s a different topic.

          • @AA5B
            link
            34 months ago

            cops need way more training on not going to lethal force in the first place. but that’s a different topic.

            Yeah, that tends to be my response as well. I usually try not to second guess a stressful situation where I wasn’t there, but all too often it really seems like lethal force is the goto response in way too many cases.

            The example above where a female cop killed a junkie approaching her …. The post was intended to demonstrate multiple shots may be necessary, but what I saw was that after telling the guy to stop, the cops only option was lethal force. I’d really like to see some of these anecdotes show cops trying other options, even if it eventually escalated to lethal force

            • FuglyDuck
              link
              English
              44 months ago

              So, like, there’s a lot to be learned from UK cops in how they handle knife-armed subjects. In general, you tend to fight how you train; so when you spend a lot of the focus of your training on lethal force, that usually becomes where your focus is.

              For example that lady that shot a guy, shouting ‘TAZER TAZER TAZER’, even though she drew her firearm. What I assume she meant to go for tazer, but in the stress of the moment, muscle memory took over and she spent hours practicing her pistol draw and not much at all practicing the taser draw. (she could have meant to do it, too, shouting tazer for the body camera, but while recognizing that… i wasn’t there and I don’t know her.)

              Increasing training on less-lethal or non-lethal methods; and actually training soft skills in the same way as firearms is how you solve that. The other thing, personally, that we really need to ramp up recruitment for police. This gets you a lot of things. Enough bodies means you can now spend a few hours a week training something rather than one or two classes a year, spread it out; physical training, yes, but soft skills like negotiation, deescalation and the basics of EDP-stuffs. the other reason is, then you can start firing all the fucking assholes. (which this is how you get institutional change. you change the institution by changing the poeple that make it up.)

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            24 months ago

            Police in Finland regularly stop suspects by shooting them into leg which according to many Americans is impossible due to how inaccurate pistols are. That apparently means the alternative is then to dump the entire mag into the torso.

            • FuglyDuck
              link
              English
              94 months ago

              Got a proper source on that claim there? Cuz… yeah.

                • FuglyDuck
                  link
                  English
                  5
                  edit-2
                  4 months ago

                  you’ll note that they don’t say he was shot in the thigh intentionally. I suspect that they were aiming center mass and were just off. it happens. hitting a running target is… well here, the FBI tallies a ~47% chance to hit between 5-15 feet. (this is comparison to an 87% chance to be hit if you’re standing still.)

                  Shots to extremities happen, nobody is saying they don’t. But doing so on purpose is almost impossible. Especially on a running target. Even with a rifle. This is why you don’t use a weapon fundamentally designed to be lethal as “less lethal”. At best, you wing him and he’s still running. at worst, you miss, and clip a mom and her infant baby behind them.

                  There’s better tools to take some one down without lethal force. (see UK police tactics with Batons, for an example.)

                  • be_excellent_to_each_other
                    link
                    fedilink
                    4
                    edit-2
                    4 months ago

                    Yeah, I’d think outside of movie-style moments it’s not something that makes sense 99.9% of the time, I just thought it was an interesting claim. It would have been more interesting if it were true. 😁

                    (to be clear I’m not the guy who made the claim)

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                1
                edit-2
                4 months ago

                Situations where Finnish police result to using their firearm are rare to begin with but you can just google it and find several articles with examples of this. However I can’t find any source on how police are instructed to act when it comes to using deadly force.

                Since 2000, ten people have died as a result of use of force by law enforcement officers in Finland. This includes a prison guard shot by accident during a training exercise, and a detainee who died of undetermined causes after being fired at with a taser.

                Source

                Poliisi ampuu ihmistä kohti vain noin viidessä tehtävässä vuosittain / Police shoot towards people only about 5 times a year.

                Miljoonasta hälytystehtävästä ampuma-asetta on käytetty vuosittain vain noin kymmenessä tehtävässä, ja niissäkin kohdistettu laukaus ihmistä kohti on ammuttu vain puolessa tapauksista / Out of a million emergency calls, a firearm has been used in only about ten incidents annually, and even in those cases, a shot aimed at a person has been fired in only half of the situations.

                Source

                EDIT: Another example

                EDIT2: And another

                EDIT3: One more

                • FuglyDuck
                  link
                  English
                  44 months ago

                  not to be a stickler, but the source makes no mention of it being on purpose. I suspect you won’t find a source that makes that claim.

                  Also, as for the general use of force in Finland vs America, it’s two different scenarios. Vast cultural differences in general… but for some perspective… there’s 2 national and 11 local agencies in finland, comprising ~7.5k cops. (per statista), all of which have direct over sight form the Ministry of the Interior.

                  For comparison, in the US there are 17,985 agencies, ranging from the federal government to local police to sherifs and state police. All of whom have their own oversight systems. we have more agencies than you have cops. and all of those agencies have their own, unique requirements for training and qualifications. hell, some states, they don’t even have to have any education outside of highschool or GED. (actually in many places… that’s preferred. for reasons.)

                  Americans are also rather more violent than Fins. Just saying.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    -1
                    edit-2
                    4 months ago

                    At no point have I claimed that they’re instructed to do so. That’s just moving the goalposts.

              • 520
                link
                fedilink
                2
                edit-2
                4 months ago

                Very rare. You can usually count the annual deaths by law enforcement on your fingers. Same goes for the amount of times a police officer has to use deadly force in a graduation-to-retirement career

        • The Snark Urge
          link
          English
          4
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Not crazy hard. Just “needs some amount of regular training and practice” hard.

          E: I just found out two of you are bad shots lmao

          • @blahsay
            link
            14 months ago

            Lol I’m an excellent shot with a rifle but with a pistol…guilty.

        • @HeyThisIsntTheYMCA
          link
          English
          24 months ago

          Y’all either need better guns or better training, because I never had any trouble with it.

          • @blahsay
            link
            14 months ago

            Try hitting something past 25m with a pistol. Better chance throwing it or I do anyway.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      4
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      I saw a body cam video of a female officer confronting a (probably homeless) dude hopped up on drugs. She was on her own in this situation without backup which was fucked up in it’s own right but this guy just keeps walking towards her closer and closer. Eventually she draws, warns him she’ll shoot if he gets closer and ends up firing twice.

      This guy took two rounds to the chest at damn near arms reach and barely even fucking blinks. He turned around, walked to a corner, layed down and died there iirc (here’s the vid https://youtu.be/8oX2ChamWwc?feature=shared)

      • @AA5B
        link
        64 months ago

        It’s possible that a less lethal response would have not only been more appropriate but more effective

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          34 months ago

          I agree. That’s the thing with the use of force continuum though, you aren’t obligated to go step by step. If you have pepper spray, a baton and a gun and someone is kicking your ass to within an inch of your life you can go straight to gun.