• @lepinkainen
    link
    English
    605 months ago

    And this is why I only buy Brother laser printers

    • jaxxed
      link
      English
      115 months ago

      Can you give us more detail about how that solves the problem?

      • @somethingp
        link
        English
        29
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Not OP but I only use a brother MFC black&white laser printer for printing documents at home. It addresses the HP issue in 2 ways. 1 - The genuine brother toner costs much less per page to the point that it’s not terrible to have to buy it if necessary. And 2 - brother does not put DRM on their printer and there are tons of 3rd party toners available at about 1/3rd the price. Generally brother printers cost more up front, but basically last a lifetime, and the toner is pretty cheap. I’ve had the same printer for around 12 years now, and it still prints fine. I don’t print a lot at home so I’ve only had to buy 4 3rd-party replacement toners, which have cost around $80 altogether. I think the printer was $200 when I originally bought it.

        Also I want to add that if you need color inkjet printing, the Canon Megatank and Epson Ecotank printers are an awesome option for most home printing. I use a Canon g6020 at home for photo printing and I love the photos that come out of it.

        • @fidodo
          link
          English
          11
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Brother printers aren’t even that much more expensive than HP. I think you break even by the time you have to buy like 2 HP ink cartridges. Even the toner cartridges that the brother printers come with last what feels like forever and they’re not even filled up all the way.

          • @somethingp
            link
            English
            15 months ago

            Yeah it’s definitely cost effective over time, and the printers generally seem to be higher quality. I’ve heard about inkjet printers breaking a lot during moves, but I’ve moved with my brother printer like 5-6 times and it’s been fine through everything.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          115 months ago

          Epson seems like a great choice, until you learn about the ecotank sponge issue.

          You can buy a new waste ink sponge for next to nothing, but the firmware counter needs to be reset. That requires either a sketchy piece of software from some Russian hacker, or shipping the printer to epson and then paying epson for 5min of work and return shipping. The latter is rumored to be about the same price as a new ecotank.

          But you’re happy with your megatank? I might look into that… I stopped looking at inkjets after hearing about the ecotank.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            55 months ago

            Wait, I thought the counter can be reset with some specific button presses only. I’ve seen the video guides on YouTube.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              65 months ago

              w00t? I will really have to look into that. There’s a reasonably priced 2nd hand A3 ecotank in my vicinity, and I’ve been avoiding it because of this.

              Do you have sources?

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                25 months ago

                Dang, I can’t find it anymore. I swear I watched a video about an ecotank counter reset once, since I was also interested in buying it one time. I’ll have to dig into my YouTube history.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  25 months ago

                  I’ll have to dig into my YouTube history.

                  That can be quite the adventure, which I won’t ask you to undertake. Because google returned a result from the site with the subs, where someone has gotten a copy of the original epson maintenance software ;)

          • @somethingp
            link
            English
            15 months ago

            Yeah the Canon has been pretty good. I’ve had it for around a year now. I sort of print in batches, like I’ll have a week where I print a few photos then nothing for a month or so. When I had a long break once (2-3 months), the printer started printing streaks so I had to run some sort of fixing cleanup cycle which fixed the issue although it wasted some ink. I haven’t had to buy any replacement ink yet because again I don’t print a lot, but I’m sure if I was using a traditional inkjet I would’ve had to buy replacement ink cartridges a few times already.

      • @fidodo
        link
        English
        285 months ago

        For home usage, a later printer toner cartridge will last you years and won’t go bad. Ink jet printer cartridges are way more expensive and dry out which is why they constantly need replacing. Brother is a much better brand than HP.

      • @Crack0n7uesday
        link
        English
        215 months ago

        Brother makes their money on printers and printer support (like really big offices that print thousands of documents a day, those printers have special techs). They don’t make as much on ink sales so they don’t really care about third party ink cartridges.

      • @Blue_Morpho
        link
        English
        17
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        You can buy 3rd party toner for Brother and they don’t lock you out of your own printer for doing it.

        On brother printers, if the printer says toner is out and you can’t print, you can press a key combo on the printer to reset the toner page counter and then continue printing until there is literally no toner left at all.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        125 months ago

        It’s funny how much worse Lemmy is at downvoting simple questions than Reddit. People on here treat every question as if it was asked with bad intentions.

        • @Deuces
          link
          English
          25 months ago

          I’m not sure, but I think part of the problem is that the votes are “real”. Since every instance has to have the same number of up/down votes they can’t get away with fudging the numbers. I have no hard evidence that reddit does, but I suspect they do to increase engagement.