@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 8 months agoMagic πmander.xyzimagemessage-square57fedilinkarrow-up1693arrow-down16
arrow-up1687arrow-down1imageMagic πmander.xyz@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 8 months agomessage-square57fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish22•8 months agoDiameter of a hydrogen atom is all well and good, but how many digits of pi will we need to be accurate to a Planck Length?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish16•8 months agoHonestly probably not that many more. My guess since I’m too lazy to do the math is less than 100.
minus-square@EvilHankVenturelinkEnglish23•8 months agoThe diameter of a hydrogen atom is over 10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 plank lengths. So based on this post I have no idea.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish19•edit-28 months agoWell that’s only 26 more digits, so we’re probably good at 100 digits of pi. [citation needed]
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish15•8 months agolog_10(size of observable universe / planck length) = 61.74… so like 63 digits of precision for everything are enough
Diameter of a hydrogen atom is all well and good, but how many digits of pi will we need to be accurate to a Planck Length?
Honestly probably not that many more. My guess since I’m too lazy to do the math is less than 100.
The diameter of a hydrogen atom is over 10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 plank lengths.
So based on this post I have no idea.
Well that’s only 26 more digits, so we’re probably good at 100 digits of pi. [citation needed]
log_10(size of observable universe / planck length) = 61.74… so like 63 digits of precision for everything are enough