• @Potatofish
    link
    -4
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    And? It says nothing about why. Or even why both broke the ceasefire.

          • @Potatofish
            link
            -2
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Seems to say they were shot for good reason. So, I don’t get it, why use that article?

            • @IndustryStandard
              link
              11 year ago

              You claim that israel did not violate the ceasefire there?

              • @Potatofish
                link
                -11 year ago

                I don’t. No one knows. It’s anecdotal, genius.

                If there are people approaching you in a warzone after they were warned to stop, shooting them is a good call.

                • @IndustryStandard
                  link
                  11 year ago

                  During a ceasefire when you’re not supposed to be in enemy territory?

                  It’s clear you are trolling. Hope you get banned.

                  • @Potatofish
                    link
                    -11 year ago

                    It clearly says combat zone. And, no, I’m not trolling. The article is written to highlight the fact that it might have been warranted. Not my fault you are slow.