Because Boeing were on such a good streak already…

  • Ann Archy
    link
    English
    7610 months ago

    Which, as we know, is not supposed to happen.

      • @dogslayeggs
        link
        English
        1310 months ago

        That design choice was revolutionary at the time.

          • @wikibotB
            link
            English
            210 months ago

            Here’s the summary for the wikipedia article you mentioned in your comment:

            The Maneuvering Characteristics Augmentation System (MCAS) is a flight stabilizing feature developed by Boeing that became notorious for its role in two fatal accidents of the 737 MAX, which killed all 346 passengers and crew among both flights. Systems similar to the Boeing 737 MCAS were previously included on the Boeing 707 and Boeing KC-46, a 767 variant. On the 737 MAX, MCAS was intended to mimic the flight behavior of the previous generation of the series, the Boeing 737 NG. During MAX flight tests, Boeing discovered that the position and larger size of the engines tended to push the nose up during certain maneuvers. Engineers decided to use MCAS to counter that tendency, since major structural redesign would have been prohibitively expensive and time-consuming.

            to opt out, pm me ‘optout’. article | about

            • Ann Archy
              link
              English
              410 months ago

              I’m starting to think Boeing is under bad management.

      • @Rob
        link
        English
        1010 months ago

        Well obviously not… Because the nose wheel fell off.

      • @werefreeatlast
        link
        English
        210 months ago

        Yes but probably management saw that as a problem limiting the future wheel assembly purchases. I mean you can land without the wheel right?