• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    24
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    I feel like of a group of dedicated Firefox engineers should fork the source code and start their own company.

    If they would focus on adding really useful features at a rapid pace, people would be willing to pay for it.

    Similiar to Kagi, if you make a really good software, you will get a group of dedicated people to support you.

    Just a tech company without these super expensive CEOs that are not needed in a smaller company.

    • @ForgotAboutDre
      link
      English
      3010 months ago

      Servo is a fork of a Mozilla research project, it’s moved to the Linux foundation.

      They are rebuilding a web engine built for the internet today, rather than adapting the older web engines of yesterday. Mozilla already uses some of their components in Firefox.

      But they are only building a web engine, for other people to turn into browsers, we views, electron alternatives etc.

    • @Psythik
      link
      English
      2910 months ago

      Aren’t there already a bunch of forks of Firefox already? How will one more help anything?

      • @cley_faye
        link
        English
        1910 months ago

        There is a difference between forks made by other people to tweak a project/do something specific for it, and the base project’s dev team moving away from whatever it became.

        I’m usually not in favor of such fork because the reason for moving away is sometime dubious; some project just rename themselves to “start fresh and drop legacy compatibility issue”. But in the case of Firefox, Mozilla is the thing holding back features while adding bloat. Since it can’t change to a saner structure with more long-term sustainability plans, devs/engineers could move into a fork to not be bound to that anymore.

        Of course it’s not that easy; for all the bad Mozilla (foundation or other, I don’t care much that they are two entities at this point since one is owned by the other) is doing to the actual software, they do provide salaries. At least, for now.

    • @fromaj_debite
      link
      English
      2010 months ago

      Lol. Firefox cost of development is $500 milions a year. Stop bs. No one can develop a browser anymore, even Microsoft. And the salary of CEO is not the problem.

        • @fromaj_debite
          link
          English
          110 months ago

          Same magnitude. We can not fork firefox with serious support

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            0
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            Yeah, I guess your point stands. But also, it’s 221 mio for Mozilla as a whole. Firefox might again be a fraction of this. While e.g. the Linux foundation has a lower budget, with all the contributed work hours of volunteers / corporations, a fork of Firefox is more realistic than the 500 mio make it out to be.

            • @fromaj_debite
              link
              English
              110 months ago

              It is not the same software. A lot of drivers are developed externally for Linux. You can not do that with Firefox. Firefox is the main project of Mozilla

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1110 months ago

      I don’t think your idea is bad but remember that the reason that small companies (like the one that makes arc) can maintain a browser is that they’re using chromium, and maintaining a browser engine is the hard part