Got it. I just asked about the evidence that convinced you, I’m not even sure how you could make the leap to
Are you saying UN is wrong?
or even what being wrong in this case means.
A lot of people believe IDF claims without a shred of evidence and that’s a disservice to the truth, like the 40 beheaded babies thing. The total child casualty count for Oct 7 was 36, including Israeli forces killing at least 2 Israeli children in one encounter.
Do you really think so many nations would withhold funding if there were mere accusations? Keep in mind that UNRWA themselves already fired a number of their employees in response to this.
The United Nations on Friday fired 12 of its employees in Gaza and began an investigation into them after accusations by Israel that they had helped plan and had participated in the Oct. 7 terrorist assault that left about 1,200 Israelis dead and more than 240 others captured.
Yet another, “I’m Israel so you must trust me, otherwise you’re antisemetic” lol
PS: Question about the claim that they were shown videos still stands. Any source for that?
Isn’t this all based on Israeli accusations? As we know, Israel can’t really be trusted
But it’s confirmed by UN themselves and action are taken on 9 of the 12 individual, with 1 being dead.
Where did you read that?
https://www.ynetnews.com/article/r1zhhvmca
How did you get to that conclusion? The only “evidence” from the article seems to be
Was pictures from the IDF the evidence that convinced you?
My opinion is based on the article where UN took action on 9 of the 12 individual after their preliminary investigation. Are you saying UN is wrong?
Got it. I just asked about the evidence that convinced you, I’m not even sure how you could make the leap to
or even what being wrong in this case means.
A lot of people believe IDF claims without a shred of evidence and that’s a disservice to the truth, like the 40 beheaded babies thing. The total child casualty count for Oct 7 was 36, including Israeli forces killing at least 2 Israeli children in one encounter.
Wait now I get it, you were being defensive.
No i don’t get it lol. You asked i answered and you get oddly upset about my opinion, now i’m being called defensive.
This person was just thing to answer your question. I think you read too much into it philosophically /:
Do you really think so many nations would withhold funding if there were mere accusations? Keep in mind that UNRWA themselves already fired a number of their employees in response to this.
It could very well be that these nations are virtue signaling to Israel rather than interested in the UNRWA staff at all.
Israel showed the ambassadors of these countries classified videos of the accused people filming themselves murdering and mutilating people on oct 7.
This is why the decision to stop funding was so decisive. Its facts that cannot be disproven in any way once you see them.
Really? I read elsewhere it was due to posts they made that support this.
Do you have a source?
EDIT: looks like the NYT reported on something similar, but not your claim: (https://www.nytimes.com/2024/01/26/world/middleeast/un-aid-israel-oct-7-attacks.html, archived: http://web.archive.org/web/20240127013656/https://www.nytimes.com/2024/01/26/world/middleeast/un-aid-israel-oct-7-attacks.html)
Yet another, “I’m Israel so you must trust me, otherwise you’re antisemetic” lol
PS: Question about the claim that they were shown videos still stands. Any source for that?