Akio Toyoda, Toyota Motor’s chairman, has never been a huge fan of battery electric vehicles. Last October, as global sales of EVs started to slow down amid macroeconomic uncertainty, Toyoda crowed that people are “finally seeing reality” on EVs. Now, the auto executive is doubling down on his bearish forecast, boldly predicting that just three in 10 cars on the road will be powered by a battery.

“The enemy is CO2,” Toyoda said, proposing a “multi-pathway approach” that doesn’t rely on any one type of vehicle. “Customers, not regulations or politics” should make the decision on what path to rely on, he said.

The auto executive estimated that around a billion people still live in areas without electricity, which limits the appeal of a battery electric vehicle. Toyoda estimated that fully electric cars will only capture 30% of the market, with the remainder taken up by hybrids or vehicles that use hydrogen technology.

  • Hypx
    link
    fedilink
    -18 months ago

    And a lot of people can’t charge at home. You will still need public stations.

    In the end, this is just the whining of a handful of rich people. If it is more straightforward to get everyone to refuel at public stations, it is the better solution.

    • @FlowVoid
      link
      English
      28 months ago

      You will need public stations with hydrogen, too. But with BEV, you need a lot fewer stations. Which is why switching to BEVs is a lot more straightforward.

      • Hypx
        link
        fedilink
        -18 months ago

        You will need millions of charging stations everywhere. Both AC and DC charging stations. It is actually less straightforward once you go beyond home recharging.

        • @FlowVoid
          link
          English
          28 months ago

          That’s ridiculous, there aren’t anywhere near a million gas stations in the US, and you will need a lot fewer charging stations than gas stations.

          • Hypx
            link
            fedilink
            -18 months ago

            That’s the point: If you can refuel instead of recharge, you don’t need that many stations. The number of hydrogen stations would be the same as the number of gas stations. And you have it backwards: You need vastly more charging stations than refueling stations. The US has something like 150k stations, and it’s not even close to being enough.

            • @FlowVoid
              link
              English
              18 months ago

              EV users charge at home. That means they make far fewer trips to charging stations than do hydrogen or gasoline users. In fact, many EV users never go to a charging station and only charge at home. Which means you need far fewer charging stations than refuelling stations.

              • Hypx
                link
                fedilink
                -18 months ago

                Again, not everyone can do this. You will have to have public chargers. Plus fast charging for long distance driving. This will still require millions of charging stations, far more than any technology that allows you to refuel.

                • @FlowVoid
                  link
                  English
                  18 months ago

                  If there is less demand for charging stations than refuelling stations, then it is impossible that you will need more charging stations than refuelling stations.

                  • Hypx
                    link
                    fedilink
                    -1
                    edit-2
                    8 months ago

                    One refueling station can serve thousands of customers, but a charging station needs multiple hours to charge each car. So you need far fewer gas stations. This is why the economics of gas stations worked out in the first place. Before, people bought tanks of gasoline and refueled at home. The gas station model was cheaper.