The business arm of Raspberry Pi is preparing to make an initial public offering (IPO) in London. CEO Eben Upton tells Ars that should the IPO happen, it will let Raspberry Pi’s not-for-profit side expand by “at least a factor of 2X.” And while it’s “an understandable thing” that Raspberry Pi enthusiasts could be concerned, “while I’m involved in running the thing, I don’t expect people to see any change in how we do things.”

  • @dohpaz42
    link
    English
    3111 months ago
    • Google
    • Reddit

    Those are the best two examples that come to my mind. Both were great until they IPO’d.

    The problem, as I see it, with IPO’s is that the company becomes beholden to shareholders who care nothing for the product, and only for the profit. Quality and profit are fairly mutually exclusive these days.

    • @HootinNHollerin
      link
      English
      17
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Reddit hasn’t gone public just yet

      • @alekwithak
        link
        English
        3211 months ago

        Sometimes you have to pre-suck to show investors you are serious about dismantling your company so they can feed on the corpse.

    • Uranium3006
      link
      fedilink
      611 months ago

      build something, IPO and cash out, then wall st. vultures suck all the value out of it

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      311 months ago

      Google IPO’d back in 2004. Do you really consider that to be the pivotal point in Google’s history?

      Reddit hasn’t even IPO’d yet.

      • @dohpaz42
        link
        English
        311 months ago

        Going IPO does not immediately turn a company evil. That’s something that happens over time, because of being beholden to so many shareholders who only care about profit.

        Reddit hasn’t even IPO’d yet.

        Reddit has been making many user-detrimental changes in preparation for their IPO.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      311 months ago

      It’s not that quality and profit are mutually exclusive - look at valve, Wegmans… Fuck the list of well known companies I can think of off the top of my head is pretty short.

      But you can be plenty profitable and produce quality products, with ethical business practices no less.

      Exponential growth is what’s incompatible with quality. And taking the money is what sets you on the path - when you take investments, you’re trapped. Eventually, you’re going to have to IPO, and every step of the way they’ll be pushing you to take more investments, more loans, reinvest it in growth… Because if you explode overnight they’ll make 100 or 1000x their investment, and if not you can sell off your future to look good for your IPO, and they’ll still make a ton of money.

      And if you fail? Well, venture capitalism is the scratch off of investments… It’s high risk high reward, one big winner makes up for all the losers - a modest win barely competes with far safer investments