sag to [email protected] • 1 year agoBiggest Betrayallemm.eeimagemessage-square31fedilinkarrow-up1834arrow-down18cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1826arrow-down1imageBiggest Betrayallemm.eesag to [email protected] • 1 year agomessage-square31fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squareyeehawlinkfedilink84•edit-21 year agoTo use “u”, “ur”, and “your” in the same sentence is mind-blowing.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish3•1 year agoDid Zoomers just solve a huge problem that’s plagued the English-speaking world for generations?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish11•1 year agoI think text speak is a bit older than the zoomers. But in any case, I propose u’re for the sake of grammatical correctness.
minus-squareNoSpiritAnimallink4•1 year agoNo it’s an extra kink in the maze of English, double possessive forms.
To use “u”, “ur”, and “your” in the same sentence is mind-blowing.
At least they r each used correctly.
Did Zoomers just solve a huge problem that’s plagued the English-speaking world for generations?
I think text speak is a bit older than the zoomers.
But in any case, I propose u’re for the sake of grammatical correctness.
Ok professor. Now fix their, there and they’re.
Thei’re. Just merge them. Simple.
Th’are
No it’s an extra kink in the maze of English, double possessive forms.
And yet here you are