• Overzeetop
    link
    fedilink
    -3610 months ago

    Does nobody proofread anything anymore? This amendment, well intended, sounds like it was written and distributed by a 6th grade civics class.

    • @Poayjay
      link
      English
      5210 months ago

      It was a ballot initiative for an amendment. It was presented directly to voters. It was written so that voters could understand it.

        • @douglasg14b
          link
          8
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Not really, the average literacy rate in the U.S is ~7th grade. This isn’t just words, this is the ability to comprehend, remember, and critically think about what is read. Which is on average that of a 12 year old…

          Take 100 people and HALF of them are more literate than a educationally average 12 year old, the rest are LESS literate. That’s half of your voters…

          It’s a sad state of the U.S.

          • @Mirshe
            link
            110 months ago

            What is “what happens when you choose to economically disadvantage schooling because you’re mad about desegregation and the institution of a federal department of education”, Alex?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          210 months ago

          So you would rather stuff that’s being put up to a vote be worded in a way that ambiguous? You want people to be able to slip in random new laws because it’s so difficult to read? How about it’s not only super difficult to read, but it was alson7 pages long? That’s how you’d rather vote?

    • @Kethal
      link
      210 months ago

      What’s weird is that the wording on the ballot appears clear. How did this altered wording get into the constitution? That wording wasn’t voted on, so how can different wording legal?