• @EdibleFriend
    link
    1810 months ago

    Bullshit. Even booked full of disgusting hate speech have their purpose as they let us know exactly what those kind of pieces of shit think and say.

    • @captainlezbian
      link
      -310 months ago

      But at the same time the value of preserving historical propaganda is different from destroying some of current bigoted propaganda as it’s being put out for mass dissemination. There’s a difference between an academic in the 90s studying der sturmer and an average German getting their hands on the same text in the 30s.

      I don’t think Harry Potter counts for that, but Irreversible Damage sure does. If you start going into the library of congress and trying to destroy their copy I’ll have a problem, but attacking the copies at a target is fair game.

      • @EtherWhack
        link
        110 months ago

        I think that would be more defined as a protest. Book burnings tend to imply that all media about a subject is being destroyed. It’s a case of semantics, I guess.

    • @MindSkipperBro12
      link
      -510 months ago

      Then place it in a museum and burn the ones at Barns and Noble.

      • @EdibleFriend
        link
        4
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        That’s the argument for statues not books. Why in the ever living fuck would you put a copy of some racist book in a museum?

        • @MindSkipperBro12
          link
          -410 months ago

          For people to see the sins of our past. I guarantee you that there’s a Mien Kampf in a WW2 museum somewhere.

          • @EdibleFriend
            link
            410 months ago

            That’s a little different because that’s a book that Hitler wrote so it has huge historical context. I’m saying we shouldn’t burn all offensive books. You’re saying all the offensive books should go in a museum.