@[email protected] to [email protected] • 1 year agoLet's dive into this $118-billion flaming piece of garbage they call a bipartisan "border security" billnotthebee.comexternal-linkmessage-square16fedilinkarrow-up16arrow-down146file-text
arrow-up1-40arrow-down1external-linkLet's dive into this $118-billion flaming piece of garbage they call a bipartisan "border security" billnotthebee.com@[email protected] to [email protected] • 1 year agomessage-square16fedilinkfile-text
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink-13•1 year agoZombie, do you have anything to add? Like maybe how reliable notthebee is, hell even an example of notthebee lying for extra points. Please remember that this sub is about discussing right wing stories.
minus-square@Zombiepiratelink10•edit-21 year agoI have nothing to say to you. You’ve proven time and again to be a dishonest interlocutor.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink-12•1 year ago interlocutor You can just say person, or commenter or debater if you want to be specific. Using fancy words for the sake of fancy words does nothing but make you look pretentious and make the conversation harder to follow.
minus-square@Zombiepiratelink10•edit-21 year agoI don’t want to have a conversation with you, so why would I care? I will not be responding to you again. Funny that you think using philosophy 101 words makes me pretentious though. Hilarious.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink-12•1 year agoHow many people do you honestly think took that specific college course?
minus-squareSatansMaggotyCumFartlink-2•1 year agoNot The Bee regularly posts properly sourced highly factual articles that are heavily biased towards the right. Fox News, OAN and NewsMax could all take a page from NTB’s book because those three fail fact checks regularly.
Zombie, do you have anything to add? Like maybe how reliable notthebee is, hell even an example of notthebee lying for extra points.
Please remember that this sub is about discussing right wing stories.
I have nothing to say to you.
You’ve proven time and again to be a dishonest interlocutor.
You can just say person, or commenter or debater if you want to be specific. Using fancy words for the sake of fancy words does nothing but make you look pretentious and make the conversation harder to follow.
I don’t want to have a conversation with you, so why would I care?
I will not be responding to you again.
Funny that you think using philosophy 101 words makes me pretentious though. Hilarious.
Why use fancy words when simple words better? /s
How many people do you honestly think took that specific college course?
Not The Bee regularly posts properly sourced highly factual articles that are heavily biased towards the right.
Fox News, OAN and NewsMax could all take a page from NTB’s book because those three fail fact checks regularly.