• Eggyhead
    link
    fedilink
    3210 months ago

    Can I just get a cheaper option that has no software whatsoever?

    • @OwlPaste
      link
      English
      1810 months ago

      All i want for Christmas is a large dumb tv

      • circuscritic
        link
        fedilink
        English
        710 months ago

        Hard to find, and unnecessary, as long as it has HDMI ports.

        I have NEVER hooked up a smart TV to the Internet, and they work just fine with my digital boxes.

        Same goes for the Blu-ray player that has Netflix, fuck that noise.

        If there’s a dumb option that is cheaper, go for it. Just don’t think you have to pay a premium for it, when you can just not put the TV on your network.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            4
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            Like u/circuscritic said, its expensive to use 5g modems here, so they have to:

            1. leach off the negbors guest wifi,
            2. hostage the consumer until they give you internet
            3. use 3g or 4g modems.

            For option 1 or 3: or rip out the antennas/put it in a faraday cage. (Yes, tinfoil works)

            For option 3 only: remove the sim card if possable.

            For option 2: not much I can say but buy a tv without option 2. Try buying a model no later than 2021-22 ish.

          • circuscritic
            link
            fedilink
            English
            3
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            That would be incredibly expensive. 5G modems are not cheap, and I can’t imagine there’s enough consumer demand that would justify the additional upfront cost and ongoing recurring charges. They’d be in clearance bins within a year or two.

            I’m sure some niche displays already have embedded 5G WWAN modems, but they’d be commerical displays for digital signage, videoconferencing, etc. Those won’t be cheap, or consumer standard issue anytime soon.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            210 months ago

            That would require a subscription to a 5G carrier, which would be crazy expensive here.

            I can’t remember which brands, but some have been found to connect to any open wifi network to do it.

            • TragicNotCute
              link
              English
              210 months ago

              They basically did the same thing several decades ago with Kindles and whispernet. It’s not really that crazy.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                110 months ago

                Sure, but that required a partnership with carriers for a legitimate use. I hope none of the carriers would allow use of their networks for things that don’t need it, but who knows?

                • TragicNotCute
                  link
                  English
                  210 months ago

                  You’re right. They care about our privacy and would never do anything to sully that trust. Certainly not through a partnership with an electronics manufacturer that pays them to do it…

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    110 months ago

                    That’s a good expansion of what I meant by “who knows…?”

                    Maybe there needs to be laws in place to prevent devices that don’t need it from having 5G access. 🤷🏻‍♂️

          • @Kanzar
            link
            English
            110 months ago

            Lucky (?) for me I live in a mobile service blackspot…

    • @RedWeasel
      link
      English
      710 months ago

      I would be willing to pay more as they are subsidizing the cost with the advertising. I have seen computer monitors are coming with ‘smart’ functionality now. Don’t want that.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        110 months ago

        Is it okay to start covering things with tinfoil yet?, I have herd rumors that these “smart” things are so internet access horny they will steal the negbors guest wifi.

        • @Spotlight7573
          link
          English
          3
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Something like Amazon Sidewalk could be used by a device to send back telemetry theoretically but I haven’t heard of it actually being used for that. Connecting to an open Wi-Fi network or through some partnership with an ISPs (like Xfinity) seems like the easiest thing a device could do though.

          https://www.amazon.com/Amazon-Sidewalk/

    • @Spotlight7573
      link
      English
      110 months ago

      Removing the software wouldn’t make it cheaper considering where TV manufacturers are making their money nowadays. The choice would be between a cheap smart TV and a more expensive dumb TV. This has been going on for years.

      From 2021:

      https://www.theverge.com/2021/11/10/22773073/vizio-acr-advertising-inscape-data-privacy-q3-2021

      It’s been less than a year since Vizio became a publicly traded company, and one consequence of that is we know more about its business than ever before. The TV maker released its latest earnings report on Tuesday and revealed that over the last three months, its Platform Plus segment that includes advertising and viewer data had a gross profit of $57.3 million. That’s more than twice the amount of profit it made selling devices like TVs, which was $25.6 million, despite those device sales pulling in considerably more revenue.

      Then there’s this taken to the extreme:

      https://www.theverge.com/2023/5/15/23721674/telly-free-tv-streaming-ilya-pozin-ads

      There’s a new type of TV coming […], and it’s completely free if you don’t count the price of your attention — or data. Telly […] offers up a TV that makes up for its nonexistent price tag by showing constant advertisements in a second, smaller display.