• @agent_flounder
    link
    English
    48 months ago

    While you’re almost certainly right… this is your response to what should be a tiny bit of good news? Maybe it’s time for a break from the news?

    I mean, what would you have done if they had ruled in favor of immunity instead of denying it??

    As for me, I’ll take the w here.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      12
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      I kinda get your point, but also If you watch enough news you realize there is no W here. It’s all meaningless because Trump owns SCOTUS and they have the final say.

      EDIT: No, SCOTUS isn’t beholden to Trump but electing him is in their interests.

      EDIT2: Well I certainly hope yall are right and they won’t let him on the ballot but I’m not holding my breath.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        68 months ago

        SCOTUS isn’t beholden to anyone. Not even Trump. Once they were confirmed they don’t need a thing from him and have that office until they die. Sure they have a right leaning majority, but they still seem pretty cognizant that there rulings can be used by democrats too, so handing wins to Trump isn’t exactly straight forward. If they claim Trump has immunity while in office and after leaving, that applies to the current administration too. It would be a huge gamble to rule in favor of Trump on this appeal and I don’t think they want to open that can of worms while someone else can take advantage of it.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          48 months ago

          Not to mention, even if Trump gets out of this scot free, the results of the n xt election are far from certain. Biden could be welding thos immunity powers for the next four years too.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        28 months ago

        They’ve ruled against him a lot. They could have thrown a huge wrench into the election by allowing Texas to sue PA, buy they didn’t it. If he owned it, it would go the other way.

      • @Telodzrum
        link
        0
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        lol be more wrong, my man

        SCOTUS is laden with Federalist Society conservative wackjobs, but they (aside from Thomas and Alito a bit) have zero love for Trump. They’re more than happy to side with him when it serves long-term conservative principles and aims, but that have demonstrated zero hesitation when his policies and pleadings don’t align with their own.

        • @njm1314
          link
          18 months ago

          Except the Trump presidency does coincide with their aims. Trump would Usher in the greatest destruction of the federal government in US history. He’s the federalist society’s dream. He has no morals or Scruples he does whatever his advisors tell him and his advisors are from the Federalist Society.

          • @Telodzrum
            link
            -28 months ago

            They’re killing Chevron without him. Maybe read something instead of harvesting takes from YouTube and Twitter, my dude.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          18 months ago

          But him winning the presidency does align with their goals. So yeah, saying he owns them is wrong, but it’s how they’re gonna vote.