Their idea was to tie approval of military assistance to Ukraine to tough border security demands that Democrats would never accept, allowing Republicans to block the money for Kyiv that many of them oppose while simultaneously enabling them to pound Democrats for refusing to halt a surge of migrants at the border. It was to be a win-win headed into November’s elections.

But Democrats tripped them up by offering substantial — almost unheard-of — concessions on immigration policy without insisting on much in return. Now it is Republicans who are rapidly abandoning a compromise that gave them much of what they wanted, leaving aid to Ukraine in deep jeopardy, border policy in turmoil and Congress again flailing as multiple crises at home and abroad go without attention because of a legislative stalemate.

  • @[email protected]OP
    link
    fedilink
    59 months ago

    It’s a decent one; the US has the ability to project force globally in a way that other countries don’t right now.

    • @Fedizen
      link
      49 months ago

      the US can’t now though because half congress are spineless lickspittles hoping to get some green piss trickledown from russian and US oligarchs.

      • @[email protected]OP
        link
        fedilink
        2
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        In the event of a Russian attack on NATO, the President already has authority to get US troops involved. Having an actual fight like that tends to create a rally-round-the-flag effect which would make it a lot harder for Republicans to start saying ‘no’.

        This would also escalate to nuclear before Congress could really change their mind, which is an incredible deterrent for Russia.