• @gex
    link
    1010 months ago

    How would you move the power down to earth?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      1110 months ago

      Microwave transmission is what’s usually said, then someone says anything in the beam’s path will get zapped, then it’s pointed out the energy density isn’t that high. Just wanted to shortcut that for ya

      • @Maggoty
        link
        510 months ago

        But what if I want to zap anything in the beam’s path?

      • @justawittyusername
        link
        910 months ago

        We need to make sure we knot it at the joins so it doesn’t get accidentally disconnected.

      • @butterflyattack
        link
        5
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Or just charge up car batteries and drop them.

        • @Cryophilia
          link
          210 months ago

          Isn’t there already a tesla up there?

          Checkmate, Elon haters

    • Cosmic Cleric
      link
      410 months ago

      How would you move the power down to earth?

      Last time I read up on it it was via converting the energy into microwaves and beaming it down.

      • @excitingburp
        link
        610 months ago

        I think masers (microwave lasers) are the new theory for achieving this, previously it was beaming microwave down much like your microwave oven beams your food.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          310 months ago

          It’s not that new. Sim City 2000 included a power plant that was just a receiving dish for a maser

    • @cygnosis
      link
      English
      210 months ago

      Funny thing is, no matter how you arrange to do that it becomes a de-facto death ray. Stick a terawatt of solar panels in space, use the power to shine a laser/maser down to earth, then build a station to turn the laser power back to electricity? Great, until some hacker figures out how to control where the laser is pointed. Then you get Dr. Evil holding the world for ransom.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        310 months ago

        Nah it’s not really bad at all:

        The use of microwave transmission of power has been the most controversial issue in considering any SPS design. At the Earth’s surface, a suggested microwave beam would have a maximum intensity at its center, of 23 mW/cm2 (less than 1/4 the solar irradiation constant), and an intensity of less than 1 mW/cm2 outside the rectenna fenceline (the receiver’s perimeter). These compare with current United States Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA) workplace exposure limits for microwaves, which are 10 mW/cm2,[original research?] - the limit itself being expressed in voluntary terms and ruled unenforceable for Federal OSHA enforcement purposes.[citation needed] A beam of this intensity is therefore at its center, of a similar magnitude to current safe workplace levels, even for long term or indefinite exposure.

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space-based_solar_power?wprov=sfla1