Playing devil’s advocate, there are reasons that aren’t just being stupid. I rarely see them in place, but it could happen
As an example, one could make a tangential comment based on the title or thumbnail in the hopes of drumming up a conversation. One might even relate an anecdote or thought for the same reason, without the desire for interaction, but with the idea of contributing a semi-related thing.
With advocacy finished, it is annoying as hell lol.
I’ve replied to links I haven’t clicked countless times but I’ve never defending my position of ignorance by claiming it wasn’t worth getting the facts straight like this guy lol
Someone didn’t bother to click the link!
Why would anyone want to read something linked from TMZ?
Why would someone leave a comment on an link they didn’t read?
Playing devil’s advocate, there are reasons that aren’t just being stupid. I rarely see them in place, but it could happen
As an example, one could make a tangential comment based on the title or thumbnail in the hopes of drumming up a conversation. One might even relate an anecdote or thought for the same reason, without the desire for interaction, but with the idea of contributing a semi-related thing.
With advocacy finished, it is annoying as hell lol.
I’ve replied to links I haven’t clicked countless times but I’ve never defending my position of ignorance by claiming it wasn’t worth getting the facts straight like this guy lol