BRICS is going after two things and it’s becoming increasingly transparent: natural resources and shipping lanes. Expect Indonesia (Malacca) and Algeria (Alboran Sea) to come soon.
If BRICS continues to expand towards natural resources, expect Kazakhstan and Bolivia. If BRICS continues to expand towards human capital, expect Bangladesh, Pakistan, Vietnam, and Thailand.
The world can be separated into a few cultural superblocs: Europe, the colonial West (North America, Australia, etc.), Indigenous/Latin America, the Arab World, sub-Saharan Africa, Hannafi Islam (including Turkey and Pakistan), Southeast Asia, and the blocs defined around Russia, China, and Iran.
There’s an increasing degree of separation between the first two blocs (Europe and the colonial West) and the rest, and BRICS has made significant progress towards unifying these remaining blocs:
In Latin America, there is Brazil (ex-Argentina).
In the Arab World, there is Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and Egypt.
In sub-Saharan Africa, there is Ethiopia and South Africa.
There’s a distinct lack of expansion towards the bloc represented by Hannafi Islam, but this is largely because this bloc is geopolitically dependent on the 4 BRICS countries surrounding it (Russia, China, India, Iran).
Then there is Southeast Asia, which has rather poor representation in BRICS and which MUST be corrected if BRICS seeks to unify the Global South.
BRICS is never going to unify anything. All they are is a bunch of autocratic regimes trying to cling to power at all costs and Brazil trying to play both sides.
Must be corrected? This is just an economic powerblock. What does South east Asia have to contribute to the block? If the answer is nothing (not enough) then noone in brics will care.
I’m curious if the economic interests will outweigh the politics/ideology in brics. I’m doubtful but the West has shown it can work even when there are plenty of differences.
BRICS is going after two things and it’s becoming increasingly transparent: natural resources and shipping lanes. Expect Indonesia (Malacca) and Algeria (Alboran Sea) to come soon.
If BRICS continues to expand towards natural resources, expect Kazakhstan and Bolivia. If BRICS continues to expand towards human capital, expect Bangladesh, Pakistan, Vietnam, and Thailand.
The world can be separated into a few cultural superblocs: Europe, the colonial West (North America, Australia, etc.), Indigenous/Latin America, the Arab World, sub-Saharan Africa, Hannafi Islam (including Turkey and Pakistan), Southeast Asia, and the blocs defined around Russia, China, and Iran.
There’s an increasing degree of separation between the first two blocs (Europe and the colonial West) and the rest, and BRICS has made significant progress towards unifying these remaining blocs:
In Latin America, there is Brazil (ex-Argentina).
In the Arab World, there is Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and Egypt.
In sub-Saharan Africa, there is Ethiopia and South Africa.
There’s a distinct lack of expansion towards the bloc represented by Hannafi Islam, but this is largely because this bloc is geopolitically dependent on the 4 BRICS countries surrounding it (Russia, China, India, Iran).
Then there is Southeast Asia, which has rather poor representation in BRICS and which MUST be corrected if BRICS seeks to unify the Global South.
BRICS is also pretty explicitly a sanctions breaker. Russia, obviously, but also Iran. Now Venezuela. Think DPRK might get in on this?
Pyongyang World would make an interesting tourist attraction in Joburg
BRICS is never going to unify anything. All they are is a bunch of autocratic regimes trying to cling to power at all costs and Brazil trying to play both sides.
Must be corrected? This is just an economic powerblock. What does South east Asia have to contribute to the block? If the answer is nothing (not enough) then noone in brics will care.
I’m curious if the economic interests will outweigh the politics/ideology in brics. I’m doubtful but the West has shown it can work even when there are plenty of differences.