@[email protected] to [email protected] • 1 year agoCostly rulelemm.eeimagemessage-square67fedilinkarrow-up1554arrow-down17
arrow-up1547arrow-down1imageCostly rulelemm.ee@[email protected] to [email protected] • 1 year agomessage-square67fedilink
minus-squareMiss Brainfartslinkfedilink18•1 year agoEh, more frames means better latency, but up to what point it still makes sense is a whole other story.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•edit-21 year agoTurn on Nvidia reflex/AMD Anti-Lag and you got both, lower latency and lower power usage
minus-squareMiss Brainfartslinkfedilink2•1 year agoReflex at 100 fps still won’t compare to 300 fps without Reflex though
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•11 months agoI wonder why, because technically it should be pretty much the same thing
minus-squareMiss Brainfartslinkfedilink2•11 months agoReflex just shaves off the extra overhead you’d get from having the gpu run at its limit. It won’t make a low framerate have the same latency as a drastically higher one
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•11 months agoI know, that’s exactly what I am talking about
minus-squareMiss Brainfartslinkfedilink1•11 months agoI think I might be too dense to get what you mean, then
Eh, more frames means better latency, but up to what point it still makes sense is a whole other story.
Turn on Nvidia reflex/AMD Anti-Lag and you got both, lower latency and lower power usage
Reflex at 100 fps still won’t compare to 300 fps without Reflex though
I wonder why, because technically it should be pretty much the same thing
Reflex just shaves off the extra overhead you’d get from having the gpu run at its limit. It won’t make a low framerate have the same latency as a drastically higher one
I know, that’s exactly what I am talking about
I think I might be too dense to get what you mean, then