Alabama Chief Justice Tom Parker indicated on the show he was a proponent of the “Seven Mountains Mandate,” an explicitly theocratic doctrine at the heart of Christian nationalism.

Alabama Chief Justice Tom Parker, who wrote the concurring opinion in last week’s explosive Alabama Supreme Court ruling that frozen embryos have the same rights as living children, recently appeared on a show hosted by self-anointed “prophet” and QAnon conspiracy theorist.

Parker was the featured guest on “Someone You Should Know,” hosted by Johnny Enlow, a Christian nationalist influencer and devoted supporter of former President Donald Trump. Over the course of an 11-minute interview, Parker articulated a theocratic worldview at odds with a functioning, pluralistic society.

“God created government,” he told Enlow, adding that it’s “heartbreaking” that “we have let it go into the possession of others.”

  • @RunningInRVA
    link
    307 months ago

    When your freezer conks out and all of your “children” are dead, then you are now liable.

    This is why people doing IVF are so terrified. They could be held liable if their embryos become non-viable.

    • TurtleJoe
      link
      207 months ago

      You can also draw a straight line between “embryos are children” and “all embryos must be implanted.”

      • AutistoMephisto
        link
        67 months ago

        Exactly. They would probably force implant embryos into women, and then arrest them for murder if the embryo fails to take hold.

    • @SupraMario
      link
      207 months ago

      It’s an act of God that the power went out.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      77 months ago

      I’d definitely get redundant generators and batteries to protect my income-I MEAN, my family.

    • @olympicyes
      link
      English
      57 months ago

      Can embryos inherit property? Could they be an end around on inheritance tax? The mobile children of the donors could be guardians of the inheriting embryo?

      • @RunningInRVA
        link
        2
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Why are you asking me? Ask the judge in Alabama who figured this all out before making his shortsighted and dickhole decision.

        • @olympicyes
          link
          English
          17 months ago

          Fine I’ll restate it as a statement. I doubt that the judge who decided that embryos are children has considered whether embryos can inherit property. A cynical person might seek to use their embryonic “children” as an end around on inheritance tax. They might treat the personhood status of the embryo like a corporation, enabling their children and dependents to control assets by becoming a guardian of the embryo in question. It’s clear that you don’t have the interest to consider such issues, so if I have the ability to ask someone I’ll wait until I can ask the dickhole and shortsighted Alabama judge directly. Enjoy your weekend.