Hillary Clinton is warning about the legality of birth control in the wake of a decision by the Alabama Supreme Court that found frozen embryos created through fertility treatments are children under state law.

“They came for abortion first. Now it’s [in vitro fertilization], and next it’ll be birth control,” the 2016 Democratic presidential nominee and secretary of State said in a post on X, the platform formerly known as Twitter.

“The extreme right won’t stop trying to exert government control over our most sacred personal decisions until we codify reproductive freedom as a human right,” Clinton added.

  • @UnderpantsWeevil
    link
    09 months ago

    They could have codified roe when Obama was president

    Or when Clinton was President in '92 or when Biden was President in '21. Multiple opportunities, but they all meant staking a position as a party and not being 300 little local independent influencers, trying to soak up as much campaign cash as they can before the next wave year tosses them out.

    • @assassin_aragorn
      link
      119 months ago

      You need 50 Dem senators willing to overturn the filibuster or 60 in favor of abortion. Unfortunately, we’ve never had those numbers.

      It’s much more of a problem that we can’t find even 10 Republican senators who are willing to enshrine abortion in some fashion.

      • @UnderpantsWeevil
        link
        09 months ago

        You need 50 Dem senators willing to overturn the filibuster

        Which they have had on repeated occasions.

          • @UnderpantsWeevil
            link
            09 months ago

            1993, 2007, 2021…

            Hell, Bill Frist offered to blow up the Filibuster with the Nuclear Option back in 2003. A minority of Dems could have simply let him, rather than caving on Judicial nominees.

            • @assassin_aragorn
              link
              09 months ago

              There were not 50 willing to kill the filibuster in 2021. Manchin and Sinema were against it.

              • @UnderpantsWeevil
                link
                09 months ago

                There was never a vote for or against removing the Filibuster. The rules decision was one more sloppy rush job by a mismanaged Senate.

                • @assassin_aragorn
                  link
                  19 months ago

                  You’re presupposing then that if there was a vote, they’d have gotten rid of it

                  • @UnderpantsWeevil
                    link
                    09 months ago

                    I’m not presupposing anything. I’m observing the failure of the Senate leadership to hold open the vote.