A set of smart vending machines at the University of Waterloo is expected to be removed from campus after students raised privacy concerns about their software.

The machines have M&M artwork on them and sell chocolate and other candy. They are located throughout campus, including in the Modern Languages building and Hagey Hall.

Earlier this month, a student noticed an error message on one of the machines in the Modern Languages building. It appeared to indicate there was a problem with a facial recognition application.

“We wouldn’t have known if it weren’t for the application error. There’s no warning here,” said River Stanley, a fourth-year student, who investigated the machines for an article in the university publication, mathNEWS.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      921 year ago

      My guess is to associate which product is best selling to which demographic to better target them.

      So ingenious 🤮

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        121 year ago

        I feel like it’d be tough to find a chip powerful enough to capture demographic attributes while also cheap enough to ship in vending machines? But admittedly I’ve little context on embedded systems and their capabilities

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          411 year ago

          While I have no idea how much a computerized vending machine costs, I found this article about a age/gender classifier that runs on a Raspberry Pi 4.

          Looking at the machine’s big touchscreen, I think this classifier would fit on the SBC or require a relatively small upgrade.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          31 year ago

          There’s a vending machine in a co-working space I use sometimes that has a full on fridge and oven, and when you order off the touchscreen…something happens inside and sometimes a hot cooked thing comes out. I have no idea how it works and have not used it myself, because it seems possibly kinda gross.

      • Neato
        link
        fedilink
        English
        161 year ago

        There’s a lot of people in the world who do, in fact, like to eat.

        • @WhatAmLemmy
          link
          22
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          There are also a lot of people, already in the wealthiest upper percentiles, who would implement big brother just to be slightly wealthier.

          • @jaybone
            link
            21 year ago

            Problem is, if you refuse to do it, they’ll hire another developer who will.

      • I Cast Fist
        link
        fedilink
        151 year ago

        There are people who actually believe that kind of dystopic bullshit, even in the tech sector. I remember a colleague a few years ago, told me he liked targeted ads because “it knew what I wanted”

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          71 year ago

          Oh boy, those people frustrate me so much. The ones who have a verbal conversation about a topic they’ve never talked about before, like owning a cat, or taking a cruise to Alaska, and then giggle gleefully when they are inundated with cat litter and cruise ship ads wherever they go on the internet.

          Some people just don’t care. And that’s actually fine. The ones who do care will try to look after the morons.

      • 𝒍𝒆𝒎𝒂𝒏𝒏
        link
        fedilink
        71 year ago

        Probably exploited labor, similar to those who have no choice but to work in scam call centers to survive.

        Pretty unfortunate that things are like this IMO

        • bjorney
          link
          fedilink
          01 year ago

          I don’t think software developers working in AI are “exploited labour just doing it to survive”

      • @Aux
        link
        -221 year ago

        I’d do that. Privacy should not exist. Everything must be public and available to everyone. Every person should have a tracking implant and anyone should be able to access it.

          • @Aux
            link
            -231 year ago

            Not /s. Privacy is a foreign concept for humans, invented a bit over a century ago. Privacy is a root cause of many social problems in our day and age.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              121 year ago

              Every person should have a tracking implant and anyone should be able to access it.

              In that case, I would guess that you’re a man, and one who has never had a stalker.

              • @Aux
                link
                -71 year ago

                Privacy is what enables stalkers.

                  • Saik0
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    21 year ago

                    Their argument would be that the stalker having privacy allows them to do the stalking…

                    they are indeed unhinged. If everything was magically public like they wish. We’d have no resources as every government official would be outed for what they were hiding. Would be complete anarchy real fast.

                  • @Aux
                    link
                    -11 year ago

                    And you’re deluded.

            • I Cast Fist
              link
              fedilink
              111 year ago

              Privacy as a human right is, indeed, new. The concept and the desire for it is old. Doing things and not wanting to get caught is as old as walking forward. What, you think the idea of cheating a romantic partner is new? That every military in history and prehistory exchanged letters with one another, saying what they were doing? That every important and “important” person always exposed everything they did and thought to everyone?

              Also, keep in mind there’s a significant number of serious journalists that need privacy in order to do their job of exposing crimes. I can already see you replying “They wouldn’t need to do that if everything was public”. True, but that would also mean that tyrants and wannabe tyrants would have incredible ease in killing everyone they disliked.

              • @Aux
                link
                01 year ago

                Well, you said it yourself - you only need privacy to commit a crime or to cheat on someone. Privacy should NOT exist!

                • I Cast Fist
                  link
                  fedilink
                  01 year ago

                  Huh, I didn’t know preparing surprises (parties, gifts, trips) was a crime. Today I Learned /s

                  • @Aux
                    link
                    0
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    Huh, I didn’t know that cheating on a romantic partner or starting a war was just preparing a surprise (parties, gifts, trips). Today I Learned, not /s

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      121 year ago

      “local only”

      Even if it’s technically local-only, pretty easy for a tech to drive by and pull data it’s stored.

      Or when it gets filled.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      51 year ago

      You know, when technology really got started, I had dreams about tech knowing me, doing things for me, acting in my best interest. Smile at the cashier, and my bill is paid, entering any public building, and I’m added to the queue, my documents already there… A vending machine would know me, holding back that last Snickers bar, because it knew that I would come by today…

      It could have been good. It could have been right. On another planet, with another species. :')

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      Best case scenario the machine has some sort of standard software with facial recognition code, but no hardware in the machine. Would he interesting to know.