• originalucifer
    link
    fedilink
    1159 months ago

    you dont need a max wage if you tax effectively. it would be 100% past a certain, massive amount.

        • Overzeetop
          link
          English
          119 months ago

          Wage is worthless wording. Most ultra rich don’t have wages - at least not relative to their change in worth. We need to change how taxes fundamentally work.

        • Victor Villas
          link
          fedilink
          1
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Anyone with two brain cells can understand that it’s a wordplay on “minimum wage” and the implementation of this isn’t really going to rely on the narrow definition of wages.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      279 months ago

      How does that work when the super rich don’t pay any taxes to begin with? How do you tax wealth? How do you tax loans against shares?

      • originalucifer
        link
        fedilink
        439 months ago

        in the united states, there were all kinds of ‘wealth’ taxes that prevented the loop holes. all that was systematically deleted over the last 60 years as conservatives decided ‘me want money, fuck society’

        • Sir_Osis_of_Liver
          link
          fedilink
          109 months ago

          The top marginal tax rate in the US peaked in 1951 at 92% on income in excess of $400k (joint filing two income), the equivalent of about $4.7M in today’s money. That should come back.

          • originalucifer
            link
            fedilink
            59 months ago

            all stock market trades should be taxed at 100% value. dont like it? dont gamble ‘invest’

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                49 months ago

                At this point, abolishing the stock market would require a restart on the United States as an entity. The stock market is quite closely linked to the banking system. Closing the stock market would crash the US economy into oblivion.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              39 months ago

              The problem is that’s basically what billionaires do, though. They take out loans with their shares as collateral. So on paper they have huge debt, but it’s minuscule compared to their wealth.

        • @UmeU
          link
          19 months ago

          And watch the few remaining small businesses who are operating on a shoestring budget and are the only ones actually paying capital gains get eaten up by the large corporations who offshore their gains. Small businesses who have debt aren’t able to write off principal debt payments so on the books they make money that they pay tax on, but in reality they just gave that money back to the bank to pay off ‘business assets’ which aren’t worth shit when the business isn’t making money. So they make just enough money to pay the bank, then are hit with taxes for the money they paid the bank, and they float by in the red until the inevitable bankruptcy. If they are a franchise, corporate then comes in and sells the business to the next sucker who is willing to gamble on the false hope of the franchise model. Big corporate sells the business to a new ‘owner’ every 5 or 10 years, and the banks get another government backed SBA loan with no risk.

          We are in the latter days of capitalism, increasing capital gains won’t work when the big guys already don’t pay shit.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        1
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Make it illegal to use shares as collateral for a loan. If a person can pay back a loan, they can buy back the shares after they sell them because they need money. Now people are paying capital gains taxes.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          19 months ago

          Ok but how are you supposed to do that when the most powerful and influential people in the world are the very people who rely on that method to maintain their power and influence?