• NeuromancerOPM
    link
    fedilink
    -149 months ago

    Even Scalia said there are limits on the 2nd amendment.

    What military purpose does a bump stock have ?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      -139 months ago

      What military purpose does a bump stock have ?

      Don’t know, don’t care, stop crying for our rights to be restricted

      • NeuromancerOPM
        link
        fedilink
        -119 months ago

        I’m not opposed to all restrictions. I’m opposed to restrictions that make it hard for me to carry concealed for self defense. Bump stock are not something I’d use for self defense or fighting a government. As such I don’t care if it’s banned. That’s what the 2nd amendment is about. A bump stock isn’t an arm. It’s an accessory

          • NeuromancerOPM
            link
            fedilink
            -89 months ago

            Be civil.

            The 2nd amendment isn’t being argued. A bump stock is not an arm. Have you read anything on the case? What is being argued is if it creates a machine gun. It does not.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              -99 months ago

              The prohibition of functional components of an arm is reasonably an infringement of the right to bear arms.

              • NeuromancerOPM
                link
                fedilink
                -119 months ago

                How? Do you think Scalia didn’t know what he was talking about ?

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  -99 months ago

                  I think he’s carrying water for his political buddies that have a vested interest in restricting our rights

                  • NeuromancerOPM
                    link
                    fedilink
                    -129 months ago

                    He is dead. So you think his zombie corpse has a vested interest in restricting our rights?