• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    -139 months ago

    What military purpose does a bump stock have ?

    Don’t know, don’t care, stop crying for our rights to be restricted

    • NeuromancerOPM
      link
      fedilink
      -119 months ago

      I’m not opposed to all restrictions. I’m opposed to restrictions that make it hard for me to carry concealed for self defense. Bump stock are not something I’d use for self defense or fighting a government. As such I don’t care if it’s banned. That’s what the 2nd amendment is about. A bump stock isn’t an arm. It’s an accessory

        • NeuromancerOPM
          link
          fedilink
          -89 months ago

          Be civil.

          The 2nd amendment isn’t being argued. A bump stock is not an arm. Have you read anything on the case? What is being argued is if it creates a machine gun. It does not.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            -99 months ago

            The prohibition of functional components of an arm is reasonably an infringement of the right to bear arms.

            • NeuromancerOPM
              link
              fedilink
              -119 months ago

              How? Do you think Scalia didn’t know what he was talking about ?

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                -99 months ago

                I think he’s carrying water for his political buddies that have a vested interest in restricting our rights

                • NeuromancerOPM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  -129 months ago

                  He is dead. So you think his zombie corpse has a vested interest in restricting our rights?