“we’ve waited too long to open the aperture on the solution sets in terms of what we need, as a society, to start reducing emissions,” Woods told Fortune

Archived copies of the article: ghostarchive.org web.archive.org archive.today

    • Bizzle
      link
      English
      209 months ago

      Is it playing devil’s advocate to say that criticism should at least be true?

        • Bizzle
          link
          English
          159 months ago

          Awh I’ve never been called a class traitor or a corporate boot licker before 😂 good to know that we’re willing to throw the truth under the bus, I always thought that being better than our enemies was the way but I see now that petty things like the truth are the real enemy. Thank you for opening my eyes.

          • @laughterlaughter
            link
            79 months ago

            Pay no attention to that troll, friend. I’m all for makeing CEOs/billionaires accountable. But what you did was good, and you don’t need to explain yourself to a troll.

            • @laughterlaughter
              link
              69 months ago

              Just shut the fuck up. That’s not even the point. OP was simply clarifying what the article said, without outside editorializing.

              I am in favor of making CEOs accountable, but all you’re doing is staining the cause with an irrelevant conversation. Wait… is that your goal? Are you a fucking Russian disinformation agent or something?

              Go back to reddit.

        • @laughterlaughter
          link
          129 months ago

          What the fuck, what kind of bullshit is this? This is not how a sane discourse works. This is the worst case of ad-hominem/strawman I’ve seen in a while.

          “Yes, OP, you’re right that the CEO didn’t say that. But do we need the truth prevailing here? He’s a CEO!!! Why are you defending him?!”

          What a load of bullshit.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              -19 months ago

              I definitely just ignore or block “durr prove it” types.

              Nah I’m not going to waste my time and energy compiling sources and whatnot just for some asshole to go “nuh uh fake news LuLuLuLuLuLz

              • @laughterlaughter
                link
                1
                edit-2
                9 months ago

                You don’t do that for the poster. You do that for other readers.

                When someone makes a completely stupid comment, like “Drink bleach to kill viruses,” I won’t go and reply “no you wrong!” I’ll reply “For anyone reading, that’s a dangerous advice and here’s why [citations].” I don’t care if the poster then replies with “nuh uh, fake nooz.”

                (I didn’t downvote you, by the way.)