@[email protected] to TechnologyEnglish • 9 months agoThe HDMI Forum rejected AMD's open source HDMI 2.1 implementationwww.gamingonlinux.comexternal-linkmessage-square154fedilinkarrow-up1863arrow-down110cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1853arrow-down1external-linkThe HDMI Forum rejected AMD's open source HDMI 2.1 implementationwww.gamingonlinux.com@[email protected] to TechnologyEnglish • 9 months agomessage-square154fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish16•9 months agoIt’s usually easy enough to adapt it as needed. It can typically send signals compatible with HDMI and DVI-D just fine.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish11•9 months agoThe passive adapters that connect to DP++ ports probably still rely on this HDMI specific driver/firmware support for these features.
It’s usually easy enough to adapt it as needed. It can typically send signals compatible with HDMI and DVI-D just fine.
The passive adapters that connect to DP++ ports probably still rely on this HDMI specific driver/firmware support for these features.