I am worried that there is not really a benefit of doing that, just more noise and energy consumption.

  • @Treczoks
    link
    English
    101 year ago

    Why would you want to do this, anyway? Or, as I as a developer regularly have to ask our sales people: what do you actually want to achieve that led you to this question?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      13
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Here’s my use-case, I’m pretty sure the first 2 are pretty common (common enough to be supported by most OEM firmware):

      • main LAN
      • guest LAN (isolated from “main” but can access internet)
      • IoT LAN (isolated from internet, can be accessed from “main”; prevents devices from phoning home)
      • @Treczoks
        link
        English
        01 year ago

        But you don’t need several LANs for this. This can easily done with proper routing. A can access internet and internal network addresses. B can only access internet, and C can only reach internal addresses.

        • @mea_rah
          link
          English
          81 year ago

          I’m curious. How would you identify who’s guest and who’s not in this case?

          With multiple networks it’s pretty easy as they are on a different network.

          • @Treczoks
            link
            English
            -91 year ago

            That’s what MAC whitelists are for. Your DHCP server should be able to handle this.

            Identify your friendly devices and give them one setting with everything (full subnet and correct default GW). Identfy your IoT devices, and give them another (full, or specially limited subnet mask, and fake default GW, maybe a different nameserver, too). Anything else is guest and gets a very limited subnet mask and a working default GW.

            • BritishJ
              link
              English
              131 year ago

              This is not the way to do it. The correct way would be multiple SSID’s with each tagged to their own VLAN.

              Each VLAN has its own subnet. You can then use a zone based firewall, to allow the zones(subnets) to access each other.

              You can also then apply QOS, to limit guest network speeds, prioritize LAN traffic etc.

              And zone based firewalls are stateful, you can do rules such as LAN can reach IOT, but not the other way. Or IOT can only reach the IOT server, on specific ports.

              • @Treczoks
                link
                English
                -31 year ago

                I know that this would be the most secure way. But I seriously doubt that this level is necessary in a normal home network.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  41 year ago

                  “Necessary” is a little ambiguous. You could argue that wifi is unnecessary for a normal home network.

                  • @Treczoks
                    link
                    English
                    01 year ago

                    Well, I think it is necessary if you have mobile devices. Anything nailed down should be connected by wire, but if it is mobile, it should get the connection. Especially if the cell phone link is not that good inside the house.

                • BritishJ
                  link
                  English
                  21 year ago

                  My solution is the correct way and easier way. You don’t need MAC address white-list. You just have a guest SSID with DHCP on, they get the IP from the subnet in that zone. No crazy subnet hacks etc.

                  Can I join your guest network, sure. Let me just grab your mac address, login to the DHCP server, create a reservation with a limited subnet mask that can still see the default gateway.

                  Or can I connect to you guest network, sure here is the code or scan that QR code. That’s it, they’re in the guest VLAN and subnet, zoned off on the firewall and have QOS applied to not saturate the network.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              81 year ago

              For anyone reading this, please don’t follow this advice. It’s terrible and basically security through obscurity

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      71 year ago

      I’m an idiot and I put emojis in my SSID and sometimes devices don’t like that but I don’t want to change everything. So there’s a guest network with no emojis

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      51 year ago

      It’s more like: I know people do this, but I don’t, so I wanted to see what was the reasoning behind these things.