• @irish_link
    link
    310 months ago

    What do you mean if your brain works in digital time. This doesn’t translate for me and I grew up with regular clocks and wrist watches. All time is the same. A clock with both hands facing 12 is and always has been twelve o’clock. Clock face or digital clock. They give the same time. Comparing two devices that give the same information in different ways to language is absurd.

    Your comparison could work if the subject being discussed was 12 vs 24 hour time keeping. Then there is a translation between the two.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      1810 months ago

      Analog clocks lend themselves better to thinking in fractions of an hour or day, like this post is talking about, as an hour and a half day are both represented as a circle

      Digital clocks lend themselves better to thinking in terms of number of minutes and hours directly. When working numerically, fractions of 60 are generally less intuitive, and fractions of 12 often so as well. Most people who don’t work with angles often think of fractions in terms of percent, or powers of two.

      “Quarter past” kind of tweaks the brain wrong when a quarter is intuitively 25.

      • @Feathercrown
        link
        English
        510 months ago

        fractions of 12 are unintuitive

        Really? I’ve always found them very pleasing.

        • Bob
          link
          fedilink
          1010 months ago

          They chose 12 precisely because it’s easy to divide!

        • Thistledown
          link
          fedilink
          English
          510 months ago

          I wish our numeric system was base 12 instead of base 10!

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          310 months ago

          You’re on Lemmy, of course you like fractions of 12. It is a very convenient base, having so many factors, but most people don’t think like that

          • key
            link
            fedilink
            English
            2
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            That might be the most obscure stereotype I’ve ever read. 😆

      • @AA5B
        link
        110 months ago

        It’s also precision. I think this is the biggest thing we’ve lost is some expression of precision.

        • 11:45 from a digital clock is very precise. You expect something at exactly that time, and get more impatient with vagaries of traffic or delays or clocks that aren’t synched, or just that people aren’t digital
        • “quarter of” implies less precision. If I have to wait five minutes, you’re still not late. Regular human activity in the real world is not exact so allowing for inaccuracy is both less stressful and more practical
    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      210 months ago

      oh i think this may be a cultural thing, here in europe when we say “digital time” we specifically mean 24-hour time because “AM/PM” isn’t used here.

      It’s the difference between saying “dinner’s at seven” and “lunch ends at 13:30”

      • @irish_link
        link
        310 months ago

        Ahhh!!! That totally makes sense. I took the comment to be about digital clocks specifically vs analog clocks. Not about the type of time keeping. Then the translation analogy totally makes sense and works! Gotta love learning new things from people. Thanks Swedneck!