• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    4
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Since using AM and PM are essentially analogue standards, will people eventually stop saying “it’s two o’clock” when they mean “the time is fourteen hundred”?

    • @A_Random_Idiot
      link
      English
      68 months ago

      i dont know if you are joking or not, but i have all my clocks unironically on 24 hour time.

            • @A_Random_Idiot
              link
              English
              18 months ago

              I mean, if someone is asking me the time, I’ll tell them 3 o’clock.

              but you asked how i vocally express 15:00. Not how I would tell it to an average person :p

              I’m not so up my ass that I think everyone uses 24 hour clocks, afterall lol

    • @Epilepsiavieroitus
      link
      38 months ago

      Talking about hundreds is American military slang/jargon isn’t it? I’ve never heard it elsewhere and it doesn’t even make sense. It’s fourteen hours, not hundreds. If we’re going that way, I think it’ll be “twenty past fourteen” and such.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        18 months ago

        Well, you could say “fourteen twenty” too.

        But if “fourteen twenty” was a year we would think its “1420”.

        Likewise, 1400 is “fourteen hundred” and not “14:00”

        Some military standards make a lot of sense, there’s no problem adopting it if it’s clear.

        • @Epilepsiavieroitus
          link
          18 months ago

          But 14:00 is what the time is and what the clock shows, not 1400. So I would say 14 o’clock if not 2 o’clock. Would you say “it’s nine hundred in the morning” too? Again, it’s hours not hundreds. I’m sorry but I don’t understand why you’re talking about years.

          For context my country uses 24h time and I grew up with it.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            1
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            It is objectively wrong to say 14 o’clock, because “o’clock” refers to the orientation of an analogue clock.

            Saying “it’s nine in the morning” is redundant in a 24 hour system, because nine would never be anything other than that.

            To say 'it’s nine hundred" reduces the ambiguity slightly (because you can’t really say o’clock).

            If you simply say “it’s nine” then other people might ask “what’s nine?”

            Is it “nine past nine”? Or are you telling me “no” in German?

            Nine hundred is pretty clear, but not to our primitive ears