@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 10 months agoBiomimicrymander.xyzimagemessage-square78fedilinkarrow-up1872arrow-down122
arrow-up1850arrow-down1imageBiomimicrymander.xyz@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 10 months agomessage-square78fedilink
minus-square@xkforcelinkEnglish96•10 months agoThey dont. It just happens that natural selection favored flowers that looked vaguely bird like and over time, flowers that looked more and more like a bird outcompeted the ones that looked less like one.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish43•10 months agoWhat’s funny is how absurd this is. Most flowers don’t look like birds and they’re fine.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish29•10 months agoThis has nothing to do with natural selection. It’s just a coincidence that the buds very shortly and from a specific angle vaguely look like birds. Most of the images shared are probably photoshopped to enhance the effect too.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish34•10 months agolooks at user name Sounds like something a BIRD would say!
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•10 months agoWow you’re right. It’s more like “look at this blossom that looks a bit like a bird” rather than “look at this type of tree that makes bird-like blossoms”.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•10 months agoI don’t think photoshop is needed to find the right flowers and photograph at the right angle.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish17•10 months agoIt’s about tiny percents. A bird will land on a flower. A bird will not land on a bird. So every one in a million time a bird mistakes a flower for a bird, that’s a flower that survives. All you have to do is wait a couple million years for the odds to turn in the bird flower’s favor.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish0•10 months ago…But birds pollinate flowers. How is a bird not landing on this (particular, too) flower going to help it survive?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish7•10 months agoMaybe they’re tree scarecrows to keep bugs away
minus-square@Old_Fat_White_GuylinkEnglish2•10 months agoIf they keep bugs away then I’ll take a dozen.
They dont. It just happens that natural selection favored flowers that looked vaguely bird like and over time, flowers that looked more and more like a bird outcompeted the ones that looked less like one.
What’s funny is how absurd this is. Most flowers don’t look like birds and they’re fine.
This has nothing to do with natural selection. It’s just a coincidence that the buds very shortly and from a specific angle vaguely look like birds.
Most of the images shared are probably photoshopped to enhance the effect too.
looks at user name
Sounds like something a BIRD would say!
Squaaawk, you got me!
Wow you’re right.
It’s more like “look at this blossom that looks a bit like a bird” rather than “look at this type of tree that makes bird-like blossoms”.
I don’t think photoshop is needed to find the right flowers and photograph at the right angle.
It’s about tiny percents.
A bird will land on a flower.
A bird will not land on a bird.
So every one in a million time a bird mistakes a flower for a bird, that’s a flower that survives.
All you have to do is wait a couple million years for the odds to turn in the bird flower’s favor.
…But birds pollinate flowers. How is a bird not landing on this (particular, too) flower going to help it survive?
Maybe they’re tree scarecrows to keep bugs away
Sir, I believe those would be scarebugs.
If they keep bugs away then I’ll take a dozen.