Found in NeMo.

    • @Zarxrax
      link
      English
      557 months ago

      Everyone here seems to be missing the point and haven’t read the article. Nvidia isn’t being targeted because they make the hardware that enables training ai. They are being sued because they trained an ai using the authors books.

      • @Dkarma
        link
        English
        -347 months ago

        There’s no difference. There’s also no infringement. Show me the copy.

        • @abruptly8951
          link
          English
          157 months ago

          There’s is a huge difference though.

          That being one is making hardware and the other is copying books into your training pipeline though

          The copy occurs in the dataset preparation.

    • @echo64
      link
      English
      17 months ago

      deleted by creator

    • @Dkarma
      link
      English
      -127 months ago

      They may as well sue bic for all of those copyright infringement enabling pens the company made

    • JackGreenEarth
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -197 months ago

      Why do you hate AI? It’s a useful tool to allow humans to work less? Or have you bought into the capitalist lie that we must work 9-5 5 days a week for an employer to have purpose?

      • Optional
        link
        English
        177 months ago

        I hate it because it’s 80% hype garbage and 10% suck. The remaining 10% varies between “instant code check” and “might be cool someday”, so it’s in the “we’ll see” column. Not worth the garbage though.

      • thepaperpilot
        link
        fedilink
        107 months ago

        You’ve set up a false dichotomy. There are reasons to dislike AI besides capitalist propaganda. For example, moral concerns with training on data without explicit approval