• @NateNate60
    link
    English
    559 months ago

    I said it before on Reddit and I will say it again here—

    If Reddit has asked me for a premium subscription to use my favourite third-party app, I would have fucking paid.

    Just bad business all around

    • @Kinglink
      link
      English
      299 months ago

      I don’t know the right price point, but 1 dollar a month probably would have worked for most people. It just wasn’t enough because they probably can make more than 1 by spoon feeding you ads now.

      • kingthrillgoreOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        89 months ago

        I’d go as far as 5 dollars a month, which is more than the buck thirty they make off users right now.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          4
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          It just boggles the mind.

          They had the userbase. They had the community moderation. They had the power-users basically doing their job for them. They could have had a bulletproof, tied-to-world-population-growth metric - not super fast, but basically monotonically increasing. They basically could have turned it into a sustainable money printer, while not crushing user enthusiasm. Hell, they could have even done an opt- in policy for ML training datasets, either offsetting or outright paying users a commission for content that’s used as part of a training set. There were so many possibilities that didn’t involve pointing the ship at an iceberg.

          Spez threw it away because he wanted the quick payout from ad revenue.

          • @Hackerman_uwu
            link
            English
            -19 months ago

            Spez threw it away because he’s a libertarian tool. He doesn’t care how he gets the payout as long as it’s not ‘collectivist’. This commie shit your’e spouting in this post would not impress daddy Elon. GTFO.

        • @Kinglink
          link
          English
          19 months ago

          Active users would, I probably would too. Problem is most apps would struggle to even get new users with that system.

    • @Rumbelows
      link
      English
      109 months ago

      100% I did pay for the premium version of Apollo and I absolutely would have paid about £20 a month for access.

      It was the #1 most used app on all my devices.

        • @Rumbelows
          link
          English
          89 months ago

          Not now perhaps, but then it was. To me. I’d not pay them a farthing now.

          • @Hackerman_uwu
            link
            English
            29 months ago

            Same here. I spend all my farthings at the taffee shoppe, or the cobblers.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        39 months ago

        I‘d say about £5 a month would be suitable for lurkers, with additional options for when your "contingent“ is used up

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      39 months ago

      Didn’t that become an option at some point? I’m sure I’ve read there are apps you can pay for to have access. Fuck that, though. Make it a reasonable price, too, and I’d listen. No way I’m paying a fiver a month for reddit. Maye 1 or 2.

      • @Kinglink
        link
        English
        219 months ago

        Apps can pay in a ridiculous deal that no app would be able to support. So you either be a pay app that no one downloads, or a free app that gets killed the second it gets too big (And that number was low)

    • tb_
      link
      English
      19 months ago

      Recently I stumbled on Relay, still going strong with a subscription model (because API fees).

      That said, I refuse to return to that platform.

      • @NateNate60
        link
        English
        19 months ago

        You can patch old third-party apps with ReVanced. That being said, they are unmaintained and will still eventually break.