@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 1 year agoWaka wakamander.xyzimagemessage-square12fedilinkarrow-up11.04Karrow-down112
arrow-up11.03Karrow-down1imageWaka wakamander.xyz@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 1 year agomessage-square12fedilink
minus-squaremodifierlinkfedilinkEnglish15•1 year agoCan it properly be said to be one stone once it got through the atmosphere?
minus-squarebrianorcalinkEnglish16•1 year agoI doubt the atmosphere had much chance to break it up much since it was 10-15 km wide. Not like the little Chelyabinsk.
minus-square@ByteJunklinkEnglish13•1 year agoOf course, it’s like my f+#-: kidney stone. If it was just a bunch of chunks from the start I wouldn’t have pissed blood.
minus-square@TIMMAYlinkEnglish3•1 year agoeh, seems like a technicality that you could reasonably argue either way
Can it properly be said to be one stone once it got through the atmosphere?
I doubt the atmosphere had much chance to break it up much since it was 10-15 km wide. Not like the little Chelyabinsk.
Of course, it’s like my f+#-: kidney stone. If it was just a bunch of chunks from the start I wouldn’t have pissed blood.
eh, seems like a technicality that you could reasonably argue either way
Aka perfect fodder for wasting time on Lemmy.
touche