• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1519 months ago

    More likely a mathematician would correct you instead of crying. Pi is not infinite, its decimal expansion is infinite!

    • zkfcfbzr
      link
      English
      849 months ago

      Plus even that isn’t enough: 10/3 has an infinite decimal expansion (in base 10 at least) too, but if π = 10/3, you’d be able to find exact circumferences. Its irrationality is what makes it relevant to this joke.

      A mathematician is also perfectly happy with answers like “4π” as exact.

      Plus what’s to stop you from having a rational circumference but irrational radius?

      Writing this, I feel like I might have accidentally proved your point.

      • @danc4498
        link
        English
        139 months ago

        Mathematicians taking a physics class and being told they have to round things. That’s when the tears start flowing.

    • @chillhelm
      link
      English
      199 months ago

      This is the correct answer. Pi is known. What it’s decimal expansion looks like is irrelevant. It’s 1 in base Pi.

      • @cogman
        link
        English
        79 months ago

        Yup, similar to the square root of two and Euler’s number.

        These are numbers defined by their properties and not their exact values. In fact, we have imaginary numbers that don’t have values and yet are still extremely useful because of their defined properties.

    • @Carnelian
      link
      English
      179 months ago

      The actual punchline here should have been “there is no known equation to calculate the exact perimeter of an ellipse”, then sucking tears from an astrophysicist

      • @marcos
        link
        English
        109 months ago

        Try it when you find some physicist that cares about exact values. Or when you see pigs flying over your head, both are about as likely.

    • LanternEverywhere
      link
      fedilink
      49 months ago

      Exactly, a fraction is completely as valid of a way to express a number as using a decimal.

      1/2 = 0.5

      They’re both fully valid ways to write the exact same quantity

    • @maniclucky
      link
      English
      49 months ago

      This was my first thought and then I realized I had been nerd sniped.