• @beefontoast
    link
    English
    4711 months ago

    Is Lemmy going to be one of the only places we can go to get uncensored content? Even the mainstream UK and US news outlets are filtering things.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      3711 months ago

      Lmao nah. Lemmy is just decentralized censorship. Anyone can ban or block anything else; anyone can start their own community instance and kill it on a whim. Multiple communities have already defederated in the less than a year that I’ve been on here.

      Lemmy solves the issue of centralized censorship/echo chamber communities, by replacing them with individual personalized echo chambers that you get to censor yourself. It’s a lot of work to set it up and sustain that type of situation, so it’s not realistic for a rational person that does not have a severe internet addiction to waste their time and effort doing it.

      • Bobby Turkalino
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1811 months ago

        replacing them with individual personalized echo chambers

        Which really wouldn’t be that bad if instances were more clear about how they operate. Like, on the user signup page, there should be a big ol checkbox saying “I UNDERSTAND THAT ANYTHING THATS NOT A POSITIVE POST ABOUT COMMUNISM WILL GET ME BANNED” or whatever

        • JohnEdwa
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          It’s been fun abusing a Lemmy bug (or an API feature, depending on how you look at it) that lets you see what a removed comment originally said on a certain .ml instance. Unsurprisingly, they almost always were something negative about China or Russia.

        • Neshura
          link
          fedilink
          English
          111 months ago

          absolitely agree, the lemmy.ml mods (but especially the admons) are extremely trigger happy to remove anything they don’t like wjethet it breaks any rules or not

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        411 months ago

        Lemmy is just decentralized censorship.

        It more like the opposite. Federated instances can keep all the federated posts without ever deleting them. Then also sell and monetize it.

        anyone can start their own community instance and kill it on a whim.

        Shutting down an instance doesn’t mean it’s censorship. If a library shuts down if it can’t stay up, is that censorship?

        It’s a lot of work to set it up and sustain that type of situation, so it’s not realistic for a rational person that does not have a severe internet addiction to waste their time and effort doing it.

        Lol, freeloader says what?

      • HACKthePRISONS
        link
        fedilink
        311 months ago

        what are the symptoms of internet addiction, and can it be treated with alcohol?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1111 months ago

          Yes. It’s basically required. Weed helps too, though many experts claim that you don’t need to smoke it and simply touching grass will suffice but idk man. Better to play it safe and just take rips between sips.

        • kingthrillgore
          link
          fedilink
          English
          311 months ago

          We know that spending several billions of dollars on a social media site is NOT one of them.

        • @A_Random_Idiot
          link
          English
          211 months ago

          Alcohol is a solution, according to science.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        211 months ago

        You always have the option of changing instances if you don’t like what the admins are doing, or creating accounts on those defederated instances to see what they’re up to.

    • @Maggoty
      link
      English
      13
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      That’s part of what the fediverse is about.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1011 months ago

      Lemmy isn’t a place. Lemmy is just the software you use to access the Fediverse. Lemmy is not censored or uncensored - only specific instances can be censored or uncensored.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      811 months ago

      Lemmy is massively censored. I just got another ban recently for taking about .ml bans in a .world thread.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        5
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        It’s wrong to say that Lemmy is censored. Certain Lemmy instances censor more than others. Go to instances you like that don’t censor the stuff you don’t want censored.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          211 months ago

          The issue is that right now about a third to a half of the content is on instances which will ban you for random shit without notification. The only way to tell is to search that instance’s modlog, so you can effectively get shadow banned from half of Lemmy even while participating in the “free” half.

          I agree that what you say is the longer term ideal, but it’s not how things currently are. I also don’t trust the .ml devs to not keep their thumb on the scale in various shady ways. They have shown themselves to be pretty shameless so far and there are plenty of ways they could quietly shape federated content by running a malicious fork. It already seems like they don’t federate much of their modlog, for example.

      • @btaf45
        link
        English
        411 months ago

        How does that work? Which server banned you?

        • Neshura
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          not sure about OP’s case but I’ve seen the .ml mods/admins censoring info about which mod did what mod action. Even called it “doxxing” (like wtf it’s public info to any other instance admin and users depending on the instance settings) so I could see them banning someone over that

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            211 months ago

            Nah it was literally making a joke about how Lemmy user engagement was up so .ml needs to turn on the ban hammer to tamp down the enthusiasm.

      • cum
        link
        fedilink
        English
        011 months ago

        Wow the server software banned you? That’s pretty impressive considering you’re currently using it and that feature doesn’t exist.

    • @systemglitch
      link
      English
      -211 months ago

      I see censorship on Lemmy approaching Reddit levels more often than I’m comfortable with. The same mods moved here unfortunately.

      • Neshura
        link
        fedilink
        English
        811 months ago

        Let’s not pretend the mods that were already here are a lot better. But being able to shuffle off content onto separate instances does have the upside of at least being able to avoid instance admins who just don’t quite like the content in your community.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        611 months ago

        Then go to other instances. Lemmy isn’t censored, the instances you visit are. You are free to start your own instance without any censoring if you want.

      • cum
        link
        fedilink
        English
        011 months ago

        Lemmy is not a single platform. That doesn’t make any sense.

      • @QuadratureSurfer
        link
        English
        3111 months ago

        Looks like the Nordic countries have some of the best protections for their press.

        https://rsf.org/en/index

        The U.S. is ranked around 45th which is disappointing considering the first amendment is supposed to guarantee freedom of the press.

        But in general western countries are far better than places like Russia, China, India, the Middle East, etc.

        • @Gabu
          link
          English
          2611 months ago

          You’re completely ignoring self-censorship practiced by the press in favour of financial gains. “Oops, looks like Nestlé just paid us a lot of cash for an ad. I guess that story about their security force beating up a bunch of slaves won’t be getting a page after all”.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            611 months ago

            “Nestlé also p̶a̶i̶d̶ gifted/lobbied someone in congress, we can’t be making the politician/billionaire look bad. We might lose our money tree”

            People are fed so much clickbait/propaganda by their news, they end up believing ratings made by themselves.

            • Ahri Boy
              link
              fedilink
              English
              111 months ago

              Nestle is worth to be automatically boycotted. Find any alternatives to their products. A lot of alternatives to Milo in my country are available, including Energen Champion.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          511 months ago

          The U.S. is ranked around 45th which is disappointing considering the first amendment is supposed to guarantee freedom of the press.

          Not really disappointing looking from the outside. Clickbait constitutions are good for propaganda for the populace. They tell you you’re living in the best country in the world while the politicians propose death sentence for women who have abortions. Cause war crimes the world over while populace thanks them for their service.

          “Disappointing” is putting it lightly to the amount of disgrace it has caused.

      • @beefontoast
        link
        English
        -711 months ago

        Why does this get down voted?