The MAGA-friendly federal judge who keeps siding with Donald Trump in his Mar-a-Lago classified records case has forced prosecutors to make a stark choice: allow jurors to see a huge trove of national secrets or let him go.

U.S. District Judge Aileen M. Cannon’sultimatum Monday night came as a surprise twist in what could have been a simple order; one merely asking federal prosecutors and Trump’s lawyers for proposed jury instructions at the upcoming trial.

But as she has done repeatedly, Cannon used this otherwise innocuous legal step as yet another way to swing the case wildly in favor of the man who appointed her while he was president.

Department of Justice Special Counsel Jack Smith must now choose whether to allow jurors at the upcoming criminal trial to peruse the many classified records found at the former president’s South Florida mansion or give jurors instructions that would effectively order them to acquit him.

  • @Atom
    link
    263 months ago

    Maybe they should move the case to DC then so there are enough active Top Secret clearances to create a healthy jury pool.

    • @NotMyOldRedditName
      link
      63 months ago

      No defense/prosecutor would want a jury make up like that, they’d be too smart.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        73 months ago

        Clearance doesn’t mean someone is particularly intelligent. But I agree a jury of clearance holders would probably have pretty strong ideas regarding proper handling of it, so the defense clearly doesn’t want that.

        • capital
          link
          33 months ago

          Those people could easily imagine themselves in the hot seat and they know damn well how it would go.

          Agree, not good for the defense.

        • @NotMyOldRedditName
          link
          33 months ago

          Clearance doesn’t mean someone is particularly intelligent

          I’m pretty sure it would weed out the bottom of the barrel idiots at least which I’m sure someone would prefer to have on the jury as they’d be easier convinced one way or the other.

      • @stoly
        link
        13 months ago

        Also more conservative than not.