• @Madison420
    link
    28 months ago

    Try the last several of your comments, I already said that so add that comment as well.

    I didn’t miss anything, it’s very obvious. Need I point out the color of the sky for you as well or at some point are you going to take responsibility for saying stupid trolly shit?

    • @Bytemeister
      link
      08 months ago

      Right, so at this point, you have made assertions without evidence, and when asked to simply reference the evidence, you have failed make even the simplest defense of your claims.

      Therefore, your points regarding my reading ability, blaming you for something, and that I fell into a “trap” by you can be refuted with the same evidentiary threshold.

      If you’d like to continue this discussion, please provide direct evidence that:

      • I have blamed you for something

      • I have fallen for a trap

      • there is a lack of reading comprehension on my part.

      Further discussion without meeting these (very basic) requirements is a tacit admission that any and all of those claims are without merit, and you yourself are trolling and not providing honest discourse.

      The ball is in your court.

      • @Madison420
        link
        18 months ago

        My evidence is the definitions you’ve provided dumb dumb, that’s the trap.

        Again reading comprehension basil exposition, using more words doesn’t actually mean you’re saying anything of value.

        • @Bytemeister
          link
          08 months ago

          This is a tacit admission from @madison420 that their previous statements are unfounded and meaningless.

          • @Madison420
            link
            28 months ago

            There’s that reading comprehension thing again.

            It’s all there, just read the big words and use that smooth fuckin brain for something other then word vomit.

            • @Bytemeister
              link
              08 months ago

              There’s that reading comprehension thing again.

              Another baseless accusation, adding further evidence that @Madison420 is not engaging in good-faith discussion, and tacitly acknowledges that their previous statements are meaningless, because they have been unable to point out any actual shortcomings in my reading comprehension.

              • @Madison420
                link
                18 months ago

                Amusing. Good luck on your lazy trolling endeavors. At least put in enough effort to keep up with the conversation.

                • @Bytemeister
                  link
                  0
                  edit-2
                  8 months ago

                  At least put in enough effort to keep up with the conversation.

                  You’re the one who is at least 4 posts behind, because as of this message, you, @Madison420, have yet to provide any proof for your claims. Without that supporting information, any further communication further emphasizes my position that your claims are empty and without substance. Feel free to quote any point in our conversation that supports your claim, in order to refute my assertation. You could have done it many messages/hours ago, yet here we are.

                  Your claims are an empty and worthless, and your refusal to converse in good faith or admit your error is a reflection of your character.

                  • @Madison420
                    link
                    28 months ago

                    Sure, don’t let reality intervene, you certainly haven’t yet.